ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2022
Antipsychotic drug dose in real-life settings results from a Nationwide Cohort Study.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antipsychotic Potential of Opioids: Rethinking Substance-Induced Psychosis and Treatment Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Spurious autobiographical memories of psychosis: a dopamine-gated neuroplasticity account for relapse and treatment-resistant psychosis.Psychological medicine · 2025Review
- Second International Consensus Study of Antipsychotic Dosing (ICSAD-2).Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Antipsychotic prescribing practices in real-life (APPREAL study): Findings from the French National Healthcare System Database (2007-2017).Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite national and international recommendations and while there is no evidence for increased efficacy of higher doses, several studies suggested that the prescribed doses in routine practice are higher than the maximal recommended doses in 20-40% of schizophrenia patients worldwide.
methodsthe aims of the present study were: (1) to describe the patterns of antipsychotic daily dose prescriptions in routine clinical practice in a large and representative cohort of French schizophrenia patients and, (2) to study the characteristics of patients receiving higher doses.
resultsin all cases, regardless of the antipsychotic treatment used, the average dose was greater than 1.0 defined daily dose (DDDeq), which is the average recommended dose. For SGA, the mean DDDeq ranged from 1.2 for aripiprazole to 1.6 for olanzapine and clozapine, respectively. For a given patient, the mean ± S.D. total daily cumulative dose (TCD) of antipsychotic was 1.9 ± 2.4 DDDeq. A "high dose" was defined as a TCD ≥ 1.5 DDDeq, 789 (45.2%) patients received a "high dose". Patients in the "high dose" group were more frequently suffering from a more severe paranoid schizophrenia, had more often a comorbid antisocial personality disorder and/or a substance use disorder.
conclusionsthe present study suggests that in France, antipsychotic drugs doses prescribed by psychiatrists are higher, compared to other countries. All recommendations agree on the fact that the preferential dose should be the "minimum-effective" dose. Optimizing prescribing practices would be important to optimize the benefit/risk ratio and to minimize the risks side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.