ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2021
The instability of functional connectomes across the first year of life.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Test-retest reliability of edge-level resting-state functional connectivity in people with aphasia.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- Structure-function coupling in the first month of life: Associations with age and attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The generalizability of cortical area parcellations across early childhood.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Multimodal identification of the mouse brain using simultaneous CaCommunications biology · 2025Article
- Measuring the effects of motion corruption in fetal fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- TR(Acking) Individuals Down: Exploring the Effect of Temporal Resolution in Resting-State Functional MRI Fingerprinting.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Network controllability of structural connectomes in the neonatal brain.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The confound of head position in within-session connectome fingerprinting in infants.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Resting-state functional connectivity identifies individuals and predicts age in 8-to-26-month-olds.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The uniqueness and stability of the adolescent and adult functional connectome has been demonstrated to be high (80-95 % identification) using connectome-based identification (ID) or "fingerprinting". However, it is unclear to what extent individuals exhibit similar distinctiveness and stability in infancy, a developmental period of rapid and unparalleled brain development. In this study, we examined connectome-based ID rates within and across the first year of life using a longitudinal infant dataset at 1.5 month and 9 months of age. We also calculated the test-retest reliability of individual connections across the first year of life using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Overall, we found substantially lower infant ID rates than have been reported in adult and adolescent populations. Within-session ID rates were moderate and significant (ID = 48.94-70.83 %). Between-session ID rates were very low and not significant, with task-to-task connectomes resulting in the highest between-session ID rate (ID = 26.6 %). Similarly, average edge-level test-retest reliability was higher within-session than between-session (mean within-session ICC = 0.17, mean between-session ICC = 0.10). These findings suggest a lack of uniqueness and stability in functional connectomes across the first year of life consistent with the unparalleled changes in brain functional organization during this critical period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.