Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419633›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Good night: Experimental evidence that nighttime curfews may fuel disease dynamics by increasing contact density.

Philipp Sprengholz, Regina Siegers, Laura Goldhahn, Sarah Eitze, Cornelia Betsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. The effect of a nighttime curfew on the spread of COVID-19.Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19: Early evening curfews and mobility.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philipp SprengholzMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.sprengholz@uni-erfurt.de.
Regina SiegersMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Laura GoldhahnMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Sarah EitzeMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany; Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Cornelia BetschMedia and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany; Center for Empirical Research in Economics and Behavioral Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNighttime curfews have been discussed and implemented in many countries as a means of controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is evidence that such curfews have little or no effect on disease dynamics when other measures such as bans on gatherings or business and school closures are already in place. There are two possible explanations for this. First, nighttime curfews may elicit reactance-a feeling of anger that drives non-adherence; second, nighttime curfews may motivate people to shift activities from night to daytime, thereby increasing contact density.

methodsA survey experiment was conducted with German participants (N = 997) to investigate public perceptions of nighttime curfews and possible detrimental effects on contact behaviors.

resultsMost participants perceived nighttime curfews as ineffective. The introduction of a hypothetical curfew did not affect intentions to reduce private contacts but instead elicited reactance, motivating participants to violate curfew hours or to shift a fictitious dinner meeting to an earlier time rather than cancelling it.

conclusionsWhen people do not support nighttime curfews or do not understand the rationale behind them, introduction of this measure may fuel the spread of the disease. For that reason, nighttime curfews should be a measure of last resort and should be accompanied by a public communication campaign explaining the importance of contact reduction during both nighttime and daylight hours.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansIntentionSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesContact reductionCOVID-19Nighttime curfewReactance

Identifiers

PMID34419633
PMCPMC8426215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.