Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419594›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Brain parcellation selection: An overlooked decision point with meaningful effects on individual differences in resting-state functional connectivity.

Nessa V Bryce, John C Flournoy, João F Guassi Moreira, Maya L Rosen, Kelly A Sambook, Patrick Mair, Katie A McLaughlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nessa V BryceDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. Electronic address: nessabryce@g.harvard.edu.
John C FlournoyDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
João F Guassi MoreiraDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.
Maya L RosenDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Kelly A SambookDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Patrick MairDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Katie A McLaughlinDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.

Funding

Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms Underlying Stress Vulnerability during AdolescenceR37MH119194 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Katie McLaughlin · 2020 to 2026
$10.6M
Child Trauma and the Development of Neural Systems Underlying Emotion RegulationR01MH103291 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
Deprivation and Threat: Dimensions of Early Experience and Neural DevelopmentR01MH106482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms Underlying Stress Vulnerability during AdolescenceR56MH119194 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2019 to 2019
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103291NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106482NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH119194NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH119194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade extensive research has examined the segregation of the human brain into large-scale functional networks. The resulting network maps, i.e. parcellations, are now commonly used for the a priori identification of functional networks. However, the use of these parcellations, particularly in developmental and clinical samples, hinges on four fundamental assumptions: (1) the various parcellations are equally able to recover the networks of interest; (2) adult-derived parcellations well represent the networks in children's brains; (3) network properties, such as within-network connectivity, are reliably measured across parcellations; and (4) parcellation selection does not impact the results with regard to individual differences in given network properties. In the present study we examined these assumptions using eight common parcellation schemes in two independent developmental samples. We found that the parcellations are equally able to capture networks of interest in both children and adults. However, networks bearing the same name across parcellations (e.g., default network) do not produce reliable within-network measures of functional connectivity. Critically, parcellation selection significantly impacted the magnitude of associations of functional connectivity with age, poverty, and cognitive ability, producing meaningful differences in interpretation of individual differences in functional connectivity based on parcellation choice. Our findings suggest that work employing parcellations may benefit from the use of multiple schemes to confirm the robustness and generalizability of results. Furthermore, researchers looking to gain insight into functional networks may benefit from employing more nuanced network identification approaches such as using densely-sampled data to produce individual-derived network parcellations. A transition towards precision neuroscience will provide new avenues in the characterization of functional brain organization across development and within clinical populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainChildCognitionConnectomeFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysNeuroimagingBrain parcellationsConsistencyCortical networksDevelopmentIndividual differencesResting-state functional connectivity

Identifiers

PMID34419594
PMCPMC8629133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.