Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419167›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

Lower objectively and subjectively assessed numeracy are both associated with poorer self-rated health.

Natalie C Benda, Zihan Yang, Haojia Li, Tianran Zhang, Jessica S Ancker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalie C BendaDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61 stStreet, Suite 301, New York, NY, 10065, USA. ncb4001@med.cornell.edu.
Zihan YangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61 stStreet, Suite 301, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Haojia LiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61 stStreet, Suite 301, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Tianran ZhangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61 stStreet, Suite 301, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jessica S AnckerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, 425 E 61 stStreet, Suite 301, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-9130

Funding

Making Numbers Meaningful: Promoting Evidence-based Communication of Numbers in HealthR01LM012964 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI ANCKER, JESSICA S. · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare an objective with a subjective numeracy assessment for association with self-reported health status, where numeracy refers to "the degree to which individuals have the capacity to access, process, interpret, communicate, and act on numerical, quantitative, graphical, biostatistical, and probabilistic health information needed to make effective health decisions"

resultsWe completed a secondary analysis of two population-based surveys, the Empire State Poll (n = 763) and the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC; n = 2609). The first survey assessed numeracy with a 3-item subjective instrument. The second assessed numeracy with more than 20 math problems. Both used the same measure for self-reported health status. Lower numeracy, whether subjectively or objectively assessed, was associated with worse self-reported health, even after controlling for education and other sociodemographic confounders. The odds ratios for the association were very similar (0.91 and 0.90 respectively). A lengthy objective numeracy assessment and a brief self-report assessment had similar associations with health status. A brief self-report measure of numeracy has similar properties to a lengthy objective assessment and is likely to be more feasible to use to screen patients in practice.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdultEducational StatusHumansMathematicsSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth communicationHealth statusNumeracySocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34419167
PMCPMC8379725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.