Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419155›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2021

Development of a peer support intervention to improve the experience and outcomes of discharge from inpatient mental health care: the role of experiential knowledge in a coproduced approach.

Jacqueline Marks, Rhiannon Foster, Sarah Louise Gibson, Alan Simpson, Miles Rinaldi, Julie Repper, Jessica Worner, Shalini Patel, Mike Lucock, Michael Ussher and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Peer support in acute psychiatric inpatient settings: A scoping review.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jacqueline MarksSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Rhiannon FosterSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Sarah Louise GibsonSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Alan SimpsonKings' College London, London, UK.
Miles RinaldiSouth West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Julie RepperNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Jessica WornerTogether for Mental Wellbeing, London, UK.
Shalini PatelSouth West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mike LucockUniversity of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Michael UssherSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Sarah WhiteSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Lucy GoldsmithSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Sally BarlowCity, University of London, London, UK.
Steve GillardSt George's, University of London, London, UK. steven.gillard@city.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-2232

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-1212-20019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPeer support is rapidly being introduced into mental health services internationally, yet peer support interventions are often poorly described, limiting the usefulness of research in informing policy and practice. This paper reports the development of a peer support intervention that aims to improve outcomes of discharge from inpatient to community mental health care. People with experiential knowledge of using mental health services-peer workers and service user researchers-were involved in all stages of developing the intervention: generating intervention components; producing the intervention handbook; piloting the intervention.

resultsSystematic review and expert panels, including our Lived Experience Advisory Panel, identified 66 candidate intervention components in five domains: Recruitment and Role Description of Peer Workers; Training for Peer Workers; Delivery of Peer Support; Supervision and Support for Peer Workers; Organisation and Team. A series of Local Advisory Groups were used to prioritise components and explore implementation issues using consensus methods, refining an intervention blueprint. A peer support handbook and peer worker training programme were produced by the study team and piloted in two study sites. Feedback workshops were held with peer workers and their supervisors to produce a final handbook and training programme. The ENRICH trial is registered with the ISRCTN clinical trial register, number ISRCTN 10043328, and was overseen by an independent steering committee and a data monitoring committee.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental Health ServicesCounselingHumansInpatientsMental HealthSystematic Reviews as TopicComplex interventionCoproductionExperiential knowledgeIntervention developmentMental health servicesPeer supportPsychosocial interventionsRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34419155
PMCPMC8379721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.