Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419142›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2021

Simultaneous GPS-tracking of parents reveals a similar parental investment within pairs, but no immediate co-adjustment on a trip-to-trip basis.

Marwa M Kavelaars, Jan M Baert, Jolien Van Malderen, Eric W M Stienen, Judy Shamoun-Baranes, Luc Lens, Wendt Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marwa M KavelaarsBehavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group (BECO), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium. marwa.kavelaars@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7631-9999
Jan M BaertBehavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group (BECO), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jolien Van MalderenTerrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Ghent University, K.L, Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Eric W M StienenResearch Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), Havenlaan 88, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
Judy Shamoun-BaranesTheoretical and Computational Ecology, IBED, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94240, 1090 GE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luc LensTerrestrial Ecology Unit (TEREC), Ghent University, K.L, Ledeganckstraat 35, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Wendt MüllerBehavioural Ecology and Ecophysiology Group (BECO), University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

FWO 11ZI716NFWO 12R7619NFWO G0E1614N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParental care benefits the offspring, but comes at a cost for each parent, which in biparental species gives rise to a conflict between partners regarding the within-pair distribution of care. Pair members could avoid exploitation by efficiently keeping track of each other's efforts and coordinating their efforts. Parents may, therefore, space their presence at the nest, which could also allow for permanent protection of the offspring. Additionally, they may respond to their partner's previous investment by co-adjusting their efforts on a trip-to-trip basis, resulting in overall similar parental activities within pairs.

methodsWe investigated the coordination of parental care measured as nest attendance and foraging effort in the Lesser black-backed gull (Larus fuscus), a species with long nest bouts that performs extended foraging trips out of sight of their partner. This was achieved by GPS-tracking both pair members simultaneously during the entire chick rearing period.

resultsWe found that the timing of foraging trips (and hence nest attendance) was coordinated within gull pairs, as individuals left the colony only after their partner had returned. Parents did not match their partner's investment by actively co-adjusting their foraging efforts on a trip-by-trip basis. Yet, pair members were similar in their temporal and energetic investments during chick rearing.

conclusionBalanced investment levels over a longer time frame suggest that a coordination of effort may not require permanent co-adjustment of the levels of care on a trip-to-trip basis, but may instead rather take place at an earlier stage in the reproductive attempt, or over integrated longer time intervals. Identifying the drivers and underlying processes of coordination will be one of the next necessary steps to fully understand parental cooperation in long-lived species.

Indexed as

BiologgingLesser black-backed gullsParental coordinationParental investmentSeabirdsSexual conflict

Identifiers

PMID34419142
PMCPMC8379723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.