ArticleDiagnostic pathology2021
Interobserver variability between experienced and inexperienced observers in the histopathological analysis of Wilms tumors: a pilot study for future algorithmic approach.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatially resolved tissue architecture and computational pathology in pancreatic cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Commentary on histologic features of Lange's folds and their diagnostic implications in pediatric eyes.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Quantitative Histomorphometric Analysis of Collagen Bundles in Masson's Trichrome Stained Rat (Health science reports · 2026Article
- Fusion Annotator: A Platform for Accelerating Consensus-Driven Ground Truth Generation with AI Assistance.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Transforming Skin Quality Evaluation With AI: From Subjective Grading to Data-Driven Precision.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Visual Assessment of 2-Dimensional Levels Within 3-Dimensional Pathology Data Sets of Prostate Needle Biopsies Reveals Substantial Spatial Heterogeneity.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2023Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Radiography Analysis: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHistopathological classification of Wilms tumors determines treatment regimen. Machine learning has been shown to contribute to histopathological classification in various malignancies but requires large numbers of manually annotated images and thus specific pathological knowledge. This study aimed to assess whether trained, inexperienced observers could contribute to reliable annotation of Wilms tumor components for classification performed by machine learning.
methodsFour inexperienced observers (medical students) were trained in histopathology of normal kidneys and Wilms tumors by an experienced observer (pediatric pathologist). Twenty randomly selected scanned Wilms tumor-slides (from n = 1472 slides) were annotated, and annotations were independently classified by both the inexperienced observers and two experienced pediatric pathologists. Agreement between the six observers and for each tissue element was measured using kappa statistics (κ).
resultsPairwise interobserver agreement between all inexperienced and experienced observers was high (range: 0.845-0.950). The interobserver variability for the different histological elements, including all vital tumor components and therapy-related effects, showed high values for all κ-coefficients (> 0.827).
conclusionsInexperienced observers can be trained to recognize specific histopathological tumor and tissue elements with high interobserver agreement with experienced observers. Nevertheless, supervision by experienced pathologists remains necessary. Results of this study can be used to facilitate more rapid progress for supervised machine learning-based algorithm development in pediatric pathology and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.