ReviewBMC medical informatics and decision making2021
Interoperability opportunities and challenges in linking mhealth applications and eRecord systems: Botswana as an exemplar.
Review in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Investigating digital determinants shaping pharmacists' preparedness for interoperability and health informatics practice evolution: a systematic review.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Pooled it
- Interoperability of heterogeneous health information systems: a systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Pooled it
- A care quality dashboard for general practitioners managing patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: user-centered design and prototype evaluation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- WiraChain: a blockchain and FHIR-based platform for improving clinical data interoperability in healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Health care management in Africa: a debate for future research and agenda.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Interoperability as a Catalyst for Digital Health and Therapeutics: A Scoping Review of Emerging Technologies and Standards (2015-2025).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Missed opportunities for digital health data use in healthcare decision-making: A cross-sectional digital health landscape assessment in Homa Bay county, Kenya.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Healthcare Practitioners' Perceptions of mHealth Application Barriers: Challenges to Adoption and Strategies for Enhancing Digital Health Integration.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Examining Healthcare Practitioners' Perceptions of Virtual Physicians, mHealth Applications, and Barriers to Adoption: Insights for Improving Patient Care and Digital Health Integration.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Health worker acceptability of an HIV testing mobile health application within a rural Zambian HIV treatment programme.PloS one · 2025Article
- Clinical Data Flow in Botswana Clinics: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Assessment.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Digital epidemiology: harnessing big data for early detection and monitoring of viral outbreaks.Infection prevention in practice · 2024Review
- Experiences, Lessons, and Challenges With Adapting REDCap for COVID-19 Laboratory Data Management in a Resource-Limited Country: Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Telephone hotlines for infectious disease outbreaks in Africa: A review and qualitative study.Journal of public health in Africa · 2024Article
- Recommendations for Developing a Telemedicine Strategy for Botswana: A Meta-Synthesis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Validation of an Interoperability Framework for Linking mHealth Apps to Electronic Record Systems in Botswana: Expert Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Health Data Governance Principles in Botswana: Web-Based Survey.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- ECG Standards and Formats for Interoperability between mHealth and Healthcare Information Systems: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Mobile-Social Learning for Continuing Professional Development in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Integrative Review.JMIR medical education · 2022Review
- Acceptance of the District Health Information System Version 2 Platform for Malaria Case-Based Surveillance By Health Care Workers in Botswana: Web-Based Survey.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSignificant investments have been made towards the implementation of mHealth applications and eRecord systems globally. However, fragmentation of these technologies remains a big challenge, often unresolved in developing countries. In particular, evidence shows little consideration for linking mHealth applications and eRecord systems. Botswana is a typical developing country in sub-Saharan Africa that has explored mHealth applications, but the solutions are not interoperable with existing eRecord systems. This paper describes Botswana's eRecord systems interoperability landscape and provides guidance for linking mHealth applications to eRecord systems, both for Botswana and for developing countries using Botswana as an exemplar.
methodsA survey and interviews of health ICT workers and a review of the Botswana National eHealth Strategy were completed. Perceived interoperability benefits, opportunities and challenges were charted and analysed, and future guidance derived.
resultsSurvey and interview responses showed the need for interoperable mHealth applications and eRecord systems within the health sector of Botswana and within the context of the National eHealth Strategy. However, the current Strategy does not address linking mHealth applications to eRecord systems. Across Botswana's health sectors, global interoperability standards and Application Programming Interfaces are widely used, with some level of interoperability within, but not between, public and private facilities. Further, a mix of open source and commercial eRecord systems utilising relational database systems and similar data formats are supported. Challenges for linking mHealth applications and eRecord systems in Botswana were identified and categorised into themes which led to development of guidance to enhance the National eHealth Strategy.
conclusionInteroperability between mHealth applications and eRecord systems is needed and is feasible. Opportunities and challenges for linking mHealth applications to eRecord systems were identified, and future guidance stemming from this insight presented. Findings will aid Botswana, and other developing countries, in resolving the pervasive disconnect between mHealth applications and eRecord systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.