Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34419000›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2021

Global overview of dietary outcomes and dietary intake assessment methods in maritime settings: a systematic review.

Fereshteh Baygi, Fatemeh Mohammadi-Nasrabadi, Birgit-Christiane Zyriax, Olaf Chresten Jensen, Despena Andrioti Bygvraa, Marcus Oldenburg, Jesper Bo Nielsen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fereshteh Baygi *Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. fbaygi@health.sdu.dk.
Fatemeh Mohammadi-Nasrabadi *Food and Nutrition Policy and Planning Research Department, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute (NNFTRI), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. f.mohammadinasrabadi@sbmu.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0001-5861-6420
Birgit-Christiane ZyriaxMidwifery Science - Health Care Research and Prevention, IVDP, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Olaf Chresten JensenCentre of Maritime Health and Society, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Despena Andrioti BygvraaSchool of Community Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Marcus OldenburgInstitute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine (ZfAM), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jesper Bo NielsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeafaring is a risky occupation with high prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Food intake and eating habits are important cornerstones regarding health and health promotion. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of dietary intake and dietary intake assessment methods of seafarers and suggestions for applicable assessment tools.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed and NLM Gateway (for MEDLINE), Web of Science, and SCOPUS up to February 2020 using standard keywords including nutrition OR diet OR meal AND maritime settings. Two independent reviewers extracted the data. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal checklist.

resultsFrom 4449 studies initially identified, 26 articles were included in the final review. Qualitative data (e.g. on unhealthy eating) had been gathered using in-depth individual or group interviews, participant observations, and phone-based chats. Composition of menu analysis, 24 h dietary recall, food diaries/ diet records, dietary habits questionnaire, food stores and food waste of the ship were used to assess the quantitative outcomes (e.g. dietary intakes). Access to meat, processed meat and egg, frozen and canned food items, sugary drinks, alcohol, greasy and salty food was high. In contrast, consumption of fruit, vegetables, dairy products, and cereals was lower than recommended.

conclusionsEating habits and dietary intakes in maritime settings are unhealthy. Subjective dietary assessment methods combining menu analysis with new technologies (e.g. mobile-based) might be an applicable method in this hard to reach setting which is the vessels.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentRefuse DisposalDietEatingFeeding BehaviorFruitHumansVegetablesFoodMaritime settingsMealNutritionSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34419000
PMCPMC8379789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.