Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34418667›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology2021

Cancer mortality 1981-2016 and contribution of specific cancers to current socioeconomic inequalities in all cancer mortality: A population-based study.

Denise Brown, David I Conway, Alex D McMahon, Ruth Dundas, Alastair H Leyland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physical activity and risk of cancer mortality in patients with and without cancer: is there a dose-response relationship?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denise BrownMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, G3 7HR, UK. Electronic address: Denise.Brown@glasgow.ac.uk.
David I ConwaySchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. Electronic address: David.Conway@glasgow.ac.uk.
Alex D McMahonSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. Electronic address: Alex.McMahon@glasgow.ac.uk.
Ruth DundasMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, G3 7HR, UK. Electronic address: Ruth.Dundas@glasgow.ac.uk.
Alastair H LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, G3 7HR, UK. Electronic address: Alastair.Leyland@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn many high-income countries cancer mortality rates have declined, however, socioeconomic inequalities in cancer mortality have widened over time with those in the most deprived areas bearing the greatest burden. Less is known about the contribution of specific cancers to inequalities in total cancer mortality.

methodsUsing high-quality routinely collected population and mortality records we examine long-term trends in cancer mortality rates in Scotland by age group, sex, and area deprivation. We use the decomposed slope and relative indices of inequality to identify the specific cancers that contribute most to absolute and relative inequalities, respectively, in total cancer mortality.

resultsCancer mortality rates fell by 24 % for males and 10 % for females over the last 35 years; declining across all age groups except females aged 75+ where rates rose by 14 %. Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death. Mortality rates of lung cancer have more than halved for males since 1981, while rates among females have almost doubled over the same period.

conclusionCurrent relative inequalities in total cancer mortality are dominated by inequalities in lung cancer mortality, but with contributions from other cancer sites including liver, and head and neck (males); and breast (females), stomach and cervical (younger females). An understanding of which cancer sites contribute most to inequalities in total cancer mortality is crucial for improving cancer health and care, and for reducing preventable cancer deaths.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMortalityScotlandSocioeconomic FactorsMortalityNeoplasmsScotlandSocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID34418667
PMCPMC7611600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.