ReviewDrug testing and analysis2022
Procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide and insulin-like growth factor I as biomarkers of growth hormone administration.
Review in Drug testing and analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioanalytical methods in doping controls: a review.Bioanalysis · 2025Review
- Procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide and insulin-like growth factor I as biomarkers of growth hormone administration.Drug testing and analysis · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The acceptance in 2012 by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) of the biomarker test for human growth hormone (hGH) based on procollagen type III amino-terminal propeptide (P-III-NP) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was perhaps the first time that such a method has been used for forensic purposes. Developing a biomarker test to anti-doping standards, where the strict liability principle applies, is discussed. An alternative WADA-accepted approach is based on the measurement of different hGH isoforms, a method that suffers from the very short half-life of hGH limiting the detection period. Modification or withdrawal of the immunoassays, on which the biomarker measurements largely depend, has necessitated revalidation of the assays, remeasurement of samples and adjustment of the decision limits above which an athlete will be assumed to have administered hGH. When a liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method became a reality for the measurement of IGF-I, more consistency of results was assured. Measurement of P-III-NP is still dependent on immunoassays although work is underway to develop an LC-MS method. The promised long-term detection time for the biomarker assay does not appear to have been realised in practice, and this is perhaps partly the result of decision limits being set too high. Nevertheless, more robust assays are needed before a further adjustment of the decision limit is warranted. In the meantime, WADA is considering using P-III-NP and IGF-I as components of a biomarker passport system recording data from an individual athlete, rather than the population. Using this approach, smaller perturbations in the growth hormone (GH) score would mandate an investigation and possible action for hGH administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.