Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417958›Full record

ArticleImmunologic research2021

Assessment of humoral and cellular immunity induced by the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthcare workers, elderly people, and immunosuppressed patients with autoimmune disease.

Giacomo Malipiero, Anna Moratto, Maria Infantino, Pierlanfranco D'Agaro, Elisa Piscianz, Mariangela Manfredi, Valentina Grossi, Enrico Benvenuti, Matteo Bulgaresi, Maurizio Benucci and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunologic research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. HLA-E-restricted SARS-CoV-2 epitopes drive CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giacomo MalipieroImmunology and Allergy Unit, Ospedale S-Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Anna MorattoImmunology and Allergy Unit, Ospedale S-Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy.
Maria InfantinoImmunology and Allergy Laboratory Unit, San Giovanni Di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Pierlanfranco D'AgaroLaboratory for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Elisa PiscianzLaboratory for Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Mariangela ManfrediImmunology and Allergy Laboratory Unit, San Giovanni Di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Valentina GrossiImmunology and Allergy Laboratory Unit, San Giovanni Di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Enrico BenvenutiGeriatric Unit Firenze-Empoli, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Matteo BulgaresiGeriatric Unit Firenze-Empoli, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Maurizio BenucciRheumatology Unit, San Giovanni Di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Danilo VillaltaImmunology and Allergy Unit, Ospedale S-Maria degli Angeli, Pordenone, Italy. danilo.villalta@asfo.sanita.fvg.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8865-4150
Nuovo Ospedale San Giovanni di Dio · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of vaccines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection has mainly relied on the induction of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) to the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, but there is growing evidence that T cell immune response can contribute to protection as well. In this study, an anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody assay and an INFγ-release assay (IGRA) were used to detect humoral and cellular responses to the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine in three separate cohorts of COVID-19-naïve patients: 108 healthcare workers (HCWs), 15 elderly people, and 5 autoimmune patients treated with immunosuppressive agents. After the second dose of vaccine, the mean values of anti-RBD antibodies (Abs) and INFγ were 123.33 U/mL (range 27.55-464) and 1513 mIU/mL (range 145-2500) in HCWs and 210.7 U/mL (range 3-500) and 1167 mIU/mL (range 83-2500) in elderly people. No correlations between age and immune status were observed. On the contrary, a weak but significant positive correlation was found between INFγ and anti-RBD Abs values (rho = 0.354, p = 0.003). As to the autoimmune cohort, anti-RBD Abs were not detected in the two patients with absent peripheral CD19

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAutoimmune DiseasesB-LymphocytesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunocompromised HostImmunogenicity, VaccineAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesIFNG protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-gammaSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2AntibodiesCOVID-19ImmunogenicityINFγSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID34417958
PMCPMC8379062
OpenAlexW3195048980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.