ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2021
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Same Disease Spectrum but Two Distinct Diagnoses.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, NOS in Leukaemic Phase Presenting With Sudden and Fatal CNS Haemorrhage.Case reports in pathology · 2026Article
- The Etiologic Landscape of Lymphoproliferation in Childhood: Proposal for a Diagnostic Approach Exploring from Infections to Inborn Errors of Immunity and Metabolic Diseases.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024Review
- The Molecular and Biological Function of MEF2D in Leukemia.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Knockdown of MEF2D inhibits the development and progression of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRare malignancies developing from lymphocyte precursor cells, lymphoblastic leukemia (LBL), and acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (ALL) have historically been viewed as different manifestations of the same disease process. This review examines data on their epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, and response to treatment while highlighting areas of similarity and divergence between these two clinical entities. RECENT
findingsPediatric-type ALL chemotherapy regimens, compared to both lymphoma-type chemotherapy and adult-type ALL regimens, have led to improved outcomes for children, adolescents, and young adults with ALL. BCR-ABL-targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph +) ALL and in rare cases of Ph + LBL. Newer therapies including blinatumomab, inotuzumab, CAR-T therapy, and nelarabine have improved outcomes in selected cases of ALL and have an emerging role in the management of LBL. Better understanding of ALL and LBL biology allows for the development of therapies that target immunophenotypic or genetic features found in subsets of both diseases. Novel therapies are leading to improved outcomes in Ph + and relapsed and refractory disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.