Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417921›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Preference and discrimination of facial expressions of humans, rats, and mice by C57 mice.

Shigeru Watanabe, Sayako Masuda, Kazutaka Shinozuka, Cesario Borlongan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shigeru WatanabeDepartment of Psychology, Keio University, Mita 2-15-45, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, 108-8345, Japan. swat@flet.keio.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0488-1090
Sayako MasudaJyumonji University, 2-1-28 Sugasawa, Niiza, Saitama, Japan.
Kazutaka ShinozukaRIKEN Center for Brain Science, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.
Cesario BorlonganUniversity of South Florida, MDC 78, 12901 Bruce Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL33612, USA.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 25118001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social animals likely recognize emotional expressions in other animals. Recent studies suggest that mice can visually perceive emotional expressions of other mice. In the first experiment, we measured the preference of mice for two different facial expressions (a normal facial expression and an expression of negative emotion such as pain) of rats, mice, and humans. Results revealed that mice showed a slight preference for the normal expression over the face expressing pain in the case of rats, but no preference in the case of others. In the second experiment, we trained mice to discriminate between the two facial expressions in an operant chamber with a touch screen. They could discriminate facial expressions of mice and rats, but they did not show discrimination of human facial expressions. Principal component analysis of the images of stimuli reveals negative correlation between pixel-based dissimilarity of training stimuli and the number of sessions to criterion. The mice showed generalization to novel images of the mouse faces with and without pain but did not maintain their discriminative behavior when new rat faces were shown. These results suggest that mice display category discrimination of conspecific facial expressions but not of other species.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalFacial ExpressionAnimalsEmotionsMiceEmotional expressionFace discriminationSocial preference

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.