ArticleHeart and vessels2022
Serial changes in the quantitative flow ratio in patients with intermediate residual stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of alirocumab on plaque regression and haemodynamics of non-culprit arteries in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prespecified substudy of the PACMAN-AMI trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Trial
- Functional assessment in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review of acute versus staged interventions.REC, interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- The relationship between glycemic risk and longitudinal changes in total physiological atherosclerotic burden in patients with coronary artery disease.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Impact of Radial Wall Strain on Serial Changes in Vascular Physiology in Patients with Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Validation of pressure-bounded coronary flow reserve using invasive coronary physiologic assessment.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A beneficial surrogate marker for evaluating the effect of medical therapy is warranted to avoid deferred lesion revascularization. Similar to coronary artery imaging for monitoring the effects of medical therapy by analyzing plaque regression and stabilization, we hypothesized that evaluation of serial changes in the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) would serve as a surrogate marker of the effects of medical therapy against deferred lesion revascularization. Here, we investigated serial changes in QFR over time after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients who underwent medical therapy as a secondary prevention. Patients with intermediate stenosis in an untreated vessel observed at the baseline (BL) coronary angiography and follow-up (FU) coronary angiography performed 6-18 months after BL angiography were screened in 2 centers. A total of 52 patients were able to analyze both BL and FU QFR. The median QFR was 0.83 (IQR, 0.69, 0.89) at BL and 0.80 (IQR, 0.70, 0.86) at FU. The number of positive ΔQFR and negative ΔQFR were 21 and 31, respectively. The median ΔQFR was 0.05 (IQR, 0.03, 0.09) in positive ΔQFR and - 0.05 (IQR, - 0.07, - 0.03) in negative ΔQFR (p < 0.0001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that LDL-C at FU predicted improvement in the QFR (OR 0.95, 95% confidence interval [0.91, 0.98], P = 0.001). Assessment of serial changes in the QFR may serve as a surrogate marker for the effects of medical therapy in patients with residual intermediate coronary stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.