Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417703›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2022

Accelerating Prediction of Malignant Cerebral Edema After Ischemic Stroke with Automated Image Analysis and Explainable Neural Networks.

Hossein Mohammadian Foroushani, Ali Hamzehloo, Atul Kumar, Yasheng Chen, Laura Heitsch, Agnieszka Slowik, Daniel Strbian, Jin-Moo Lee, Daniel S Marcus, Rajat Dhar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Imaging biomarkers of cerebral edema automatically extracted from routine CT scans of large vessel occlusion strokes.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hossein Mohammadian ForoushaniDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis McKelvey School of Engineering, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA.
Ali HamzehlooDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Atul KumarDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Yasheng ChenDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Laura HeitschDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Campus, Box 8072, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Agnieszka SlowikDepartment of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Daniel StrbianDepartment of Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Jin-Moo LeeDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Daniel S MarcusDepartment of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 525 Scott Ave, Campus, Box 8225, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Rajat DharDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Avenue, Campus, Box 8111, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. dharr@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5167-5097
Washington University in St. Louis · USHelsinki University Hospital · FIJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

Genetic Architecture of Acute Human Brain IschemiaR01NS085419 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CRUCHAGA, CARLOS, LEE, JIN-MOO · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
Mid-America Regional Coordinating Center (MARCC)U24NS107230 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Andria Lee Ford, Peter David Panagos · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NINDS CENTER CORE FOR BRAIN IMAGINGP30NS098577 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI RAICHLE, MARCUS E · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
GENETICS OF EARLY NEUROLOGICAL INSTABILITY AFTER ISCHEMIC STROKE (GENISIS)K23NS099487 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HEITSCH, LAURA · 2017 to 2021
$996k
GENETICS AND PREDICTION OF CEREBRAL EDEMA AFTER HEMISPHERIC STROKEK23NS099440 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DHAR, RAJAT · 2017 to 2021
$890k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099440NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS099487NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS098577NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS085419NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant cerebral edema is a devastating complication of stroke, resulting in deterioration and death if hemicraniectomy is not performed prior to herniation. Current approaches for predicting this relatively rare complication often require advanced imaging and still suffer from suboptimal performance. We performed a pilot study to evaluate whether neural networks incorporating data extracted from routine computed tomography (CT) imaging could enhance prediction of edema in a large diverse stroke cohort.

methodsAn automated imaging pipeline retrospectively extracted volumetric data, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes and the hemispheric CSF volume ratio, from baseline and 24 h CT scans performed in participants of an international stroke cohort study. Fully connected and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks were trained using serial clinical and imaging data to predict those who would require hemicraniectomy or die with midline shift. The performance of these models was tested, in comparison with regression models and the Enhanced Detection of Edema in Malignant Anterior Circulation Stroke (EDEMA) score, using cross-validation to construct precision-recall curves.

resultsTwenty of 598 patients developed malignant edema (12 required surgery, 8 died). The regression model provided 95% recall but only 32% precision (area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC] 0.74), similar to the EDEMA score (precision 28%, AUPRC 0.66). The fully connected network did not perform better (precision 33%, AUPRC 0.71), but the LSTM model provided 100% recall and 87% precision (AUPRC 0.97) in the overall cohort and the subgroup with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 (p = 0.0001 vs. regression and fully connected models). Features providing the most predictive importance were the hemispheric CSF ratio and NIHSS score measured at 24 h.

conclusionsAn LSTM neural network incorporating volumetric data extracted from routine CT scans identified all cases of malignant cerebral edema by 24 h after stroke, with significantly fewer false positives than a fully connected neural network, regression model, and the validated EDEMA score. This preliminary work requires prospective validation but provides proof of principle that a deep learning framework could assist in selecting patients for surgery prior to deterioration.

Indexed as

Brain EdemaIschemic StrokeStrokeCohort StudiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesBrain computed tomography scanBrain edemaCerebral infarctionDeep learningEarly diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID34417703
PMCPMC8858326
OpenAlexW3193326742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.