Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417670›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2022

Clinical implications of compromised

Andrew Van Tosh, J Jane Cao, John R Votaw, C David Cooke, Christopher J Palestro, Kenneth J Nichols

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Measuring myocardial blood flow using dynamic myocardial perfusion SPECT: artifacts and pitfalls.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Retention models: 'tis the gift to be simple.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew Van ToshSt. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.
J Jane CaoSt. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.
John R VotawEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C David CookeEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christopher J PalestroDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Kenneth J NicholsDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA. knichols@northwell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe wished to document the prevalence and quantitative effects of compromised METHODS AND

resultsData were analyzed retrospectively for 246 rest and regadenoson-stress studies of 123 patients evaluated for known or suspected CAD. An automated injector delivered pre-determined activities of

conclusionIt is important to verify integrity of

Indexed as

Data AccuracyFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialPositron-Emission TomographyCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansRetrospective StudiesRubidium RadioisotopesRubidium Radioisotopes82RbMyocardial blood flowPETQuality assurance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.