Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417637›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Results from a PI-RADS-based MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for biopsy-naive patients in a non-university hospital.

Jeroen S Reijnen, Jon B Marthinsen, Alf O Tysland, Christoph Müller, Irina Schönhardt, Erlend Andersen, Therese Seierstad, Knut H Hole

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeroen S ReijnenDepartment of Radiology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-8163
Jon B MarthinsenDepartment of Radiology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Alf O TyslandDepartment of Urology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Christoph MüllerDepartment for Cancer Treatment, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-6088
Irina SchönhardtDepartment of Pathology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Erlend AndersenDepartment of Radiology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway.
Therese SeierstadDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, P.o.box 4950, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway. therese@radium.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2579-5298
Knut H HoleInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6885-8538
Sørlandet Sykehus · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the safety and performance of a MRI-directed diagnostic pathway for patients with first-time suspicion of prostate cancer in a non-university hospital.

methodsBetween May 2017 and December 2018 all biopsy-naive patients examined in our hospital followed a MRI-directed diagnostic work-up algorithm based on PI-RADS score. In short, PI-RADS 1-2 was generally not biopsied and PI-RADS 3-5 was reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. Patients with PI-RADS 4-5 were all referred to biopsy, either transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy or MRI in-bore biopsy for small tumors and for sites difficult to access. PI-RADS scores were compared to the histopathology from biopsies and surgical specimens for patients who had prostatectomy. Non-biopsied patients were referred to a safety net monitoring regimen.

resultsTwo hundred and ninety-eight men were enrolled. 97 (33%) had PI-RADS 1-2, 44 (15%) had PI-RADS 3, and 157 (53%) had PI-RADS 4-5. 116 (39%) of the patients avoided biopsy. None of these were diagnosed with significant cancer within 2-3.5 years of safety net monitoring. Almost all high ISUP grade groups (≥ 3) were in the PI-RADS 4-5 category (98%). Prostatectomy specimens and systematic biopsies from MRI-negative areas indicated that very few clinically significant cancers were missed by the MRI-directed diagnostic pathway.

conclusionOur findings add to evidence that a MRI-directed diagnostic pathway can be safely established in a non-university hospital. The pathway reduced the number of biopsies and reliably detected the site of the most aggressive cancers.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalProstatic NeoplasmsHospitalsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesAlgorithmsBiopsyMagnetic resonance imagingPatient care teamProstate neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID34417637
PMCPMC8590681
OpenAlexW3194561045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.