ArticleNucleic acids research2021
Computational resources to define alleles and altered regulatory motifs at genomically edited candidate response elements.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CRISPR and Artificial Intelligence in Neuroregeneration: Closed-Loop Strategies for Precision Medicine, Spinal Cord Repair, and Adaptive Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unequivocal functional assessment of candidate genomic regulatory regions, such as transcriptional response elements, requires genetic alteration at their native chromosomal loci. Targeted DNA cleavage by Cas9 or other programmable nucleases enables analysis at virtually any genomic region, and diverse alleles generated by editing can be defined by deep sequencing for functional analysis. Interpretation of disrupted response elements, however, presents a special challenge, as these regions typically comprise clustered DNA binding motifs for multiple transcriptional regulatory factors (TFs); DNA sequence differences, natural or engineered, that affect binding by one TF can confer loss or gain of binding sites for other TFs. To address these and other analytical complexities, we created three computational tools that together integrate, in a single experiment, allele definition and TF binding motif evaluation for up to 9216 clones isolated, sequenced and propagated from Cas9-treated cell populations. We demonstrate 1) the capacity to functionally assess edited TF binding sites to query response element function, and 2) the efficacy and utility of these tools, by analyzing cell populations targeted by Cas9 for disruption of example glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding motifs near FKBP5, a GR-regulated gene in the human adenocarcinoma cell line A549.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.