Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417493›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Modelling menstrual cycle length in athletes using state-space models.

Thiago de Paula Oliveira, Georgie Bruinvels, Charles R Pedlar, Brian Moore, John Newell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Menstrual cycle tracking in professional volleyball athletes.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A predictive model for next cycle start date that accounts for adherence in menstrual self-tracking.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thiago de Paula OliveiraSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Georgie BruinvelsOrreco, Business Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Charles R PedlarOrreco, Business Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Brian MooreOrreco, Business Innovation Centre, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
John NewellSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Applied Mathematics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. john.newell@nuigalway.ie.
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IESt Mary's University Twickenham London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to predict an individual's menstrual cycle length to a high degree of precision could help female athletes to track their period and tailor their training and nutrition correspondingly. Such individualisation is possible and necessary, given the known inter-individual variation in cycle length. To achieve this, a hybrid predictive model was built using data on 16,524 cycles collected from a sample of 2125 women (mean age 34.38 years, range 18.00-47.10, number of menstrual cycles ranging from 4 to 53). A mixed-effect state-space model was fitted to capture the within-subject temporal correlation, incorporating a Bayesian approach for process forecasting to predict the duration (in days) of the next menstrual cycle. The modelling procedure was split into three steps (1) a time trend component using a random walk with an overdispersion parameter, (2) an autocorrelation component using an autoregressive moving-average model, and (3) a linear predictor to account for covariates (e.g. injury, stomach cramps, training intensity). The inclusion of an overdispersion parameter suggested that [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] of cycles in the sample were overdispersed. The random walk standard deviation for a non-overdispersed cycle is [Formula: see text] [1.00, 1.09] days while under an overdispersed cycle, the menstrual cycle variance increase in 4.78 [4.57, 5.00] days. To assess the performance and prediction accuracy of the model, each woman's last observation was used as test data. The root mean square error (RMSE), concordance correlation coefficient and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between the observed and predicted values were calculated. The model had an RMSE of 1.6412 days, a precision of 0.7361 and overall accuracy of 0.9871. In conclusion, the hybrid model presented here is a helpful approach for predicting menstrual cycle length, which in turn can be used to support female athlete wellness.

Indexed as

AthletesModels, BiologicalAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBayes TheoremBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMarkov ChainsMenstrual CycleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34417493
PMCPMC8379295
OpenAlexW3113132668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.