Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Implicit and explicit learning of Bayesian priors differently impacts bias during perceptual decision-making.

V N Thakur, M A Basso, J Ditterich, B J Knowlton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V N ThakurDepartment of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
M A BassoFuster Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, Departments of Neurobiology and Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J DitterichCenter for Neuroscience and Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, & Behavior, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
B J KnowltonDepartment of Psychology, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. knowlton@psych.ucla.edu.

Funding

Visual Target Selection for Saccadic Eye MovementsR01EY013692 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BASSO, MICHELE A · 2002 to 2021
$7.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge without awareness, or implicit knowledge, influences a variety of behaviors. It is unknown however, whether implicit knowledge of statistical structure informs visual perceptual decisions or whether explicit knowledge of statistical probabilities is required. Here, we measured visual decision-making performance using a novel task in which humans reported the orientation of two differently colored translational Glass patterns; each color associated with different orientation probabilities. The task design allowed us to assess participants' ability to learn and use a general orientation prior as well as a color specific feature prior. Classifying decision-makers based on a questionnaire revealed that both implicit and explicit learners implemented a general orientation bias by adjusting the starting point of evidence accumulation in the drift diffusion model framework. Explicit learners additionally adjusted the drift rate offset. When subjects implemented a stimulus specific bias, they did so by adjusting primarily the drift rate offset. We conclude that humans can learn priors implicitly for perceptual decision-making and depending on awareness implement the priors using different mechanisms.

Indexed as

Decision MakingLearningAdolescentAdultBayes TheoremBiasDiffusionFemaleHumansMaleTask Performance and AnalysisVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34417478
PMCPMC8379185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.