Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34417010›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2020

A spatial neighborhood methodology for computing and analyzing lymph node carcinoma similarity in precision medicine.

T Luciani, A Wentzel, B Elgohari, H Elhalawani, A Mohamed, G Canahuate, D M Vock, C D Fuller, G E Marai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurosurgery Network Pattern Analysis with 2nd Generation Ensembles.Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics · 2026
    Article
  2. Lessons from the Development and Deployment of an Interactive Oncological Risk Estimator.... IEEE Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare. IEEE Workshop on Visual Analytics in Healthcare · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DASS Good: Explainable Data Mining of Spatial Cohort Data.Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Precision association of lymphatic disease spread with radiation-associated toxicity in oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Predicting late symptoms of head and neck cancer treatment using LSTM and patient reported outcomes.Proceedings. International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium · 2021
    Article
  13. Identifying Symptom Clusters Through Association Rule Mining.Artificial intelligence in medicine. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (2005- ) · 2021
    Article
  14. Explainable Spatial Clustering: Leveraging Spatial Data in Radiation Oncology.IEEE Visualization Conference : VIS. IEEE Conference on Visualization · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T LucianiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
A WentzelDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States.
B ElgohariMD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
H ElhalawaniMD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
A MohamedMD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
G CanahuateDepartment of Computer Science, University of Iowa, United States.
D M VockDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, United States.
C D FullerMD Anderson Cancer Center, United States.
G E MaraiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States. Electronic address: gmarai@uic.edu.
University of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Longitudinal Spatial-Nonspatial Decision Support for Competing Outcomes in Head and Neck Cancer TherapyR01CA258827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$2.9M
Uncovering Clinical Evidence in COVID-19 Publications: An Integrated Search via Text & ImagesR01LM012527 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI EIGENMANN, RUDOLF, MARAI, GEORGETA-ELISABETA · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
SMART-ACT: Spatial Methodologic Approaches for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Adaptation in Cancer TreatmentR01CA214825 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI CANAHUATE, GUADALUPE, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
Fellow and Resident Radiation Oncology iNtensive Training in Imaging and Informatics to Empower Research Careers (FRONTI2ER)R25EB025787 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DAS, PRAJNAN, FULLER, CLIFTON DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$535k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA214825NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258827NIBIB NIH HHS R25 EB025787NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision medicine seeks to tailor therapy to the individual patient, based on statistical correlates from patients who are similar to the one under consideration. These correlates can and should go beyond genetics, and in general, beyond tabular or array data that can be easily represented computationally and compared. For example, in many types of cancer, cancer treatment and toxicity depend in large measure on the spatial disease spread-e.g., metastasizes to regional lymph nodes in head and neck cancer. However, there is currently a lack of methodology for integrating spatial information when considering patient similarity. We present a novel modeling methodology for the comparison of cancer patients within a cohort, based on the spatial spread of the lymph nodes affected in each patient. The method uses a topological map, bigrams, and hierarchical clustering to group patients based on their similarity. We compare this approach against a nonspatial (categorical) similarity approach where patients are binned solely by their affected nodes. We present similarity results on a 582 head and neck cancer patient cohort, along with two visual abstractions for analysis of the results, and we present clinician feedback. Our novel methodology partitions a patient cohort into clinically meaningful groups more susceptible to treatment side-effects. Such spatially-aware similarity approaches can help maximize the effectiveness of each patient's treatment.

Indexed as

OncologyPrecision medicineSpatial similarityTopologyVisual interface

Identifiers

PMID34417010
PMCPMC10695270
OpenAlexW3005422048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.