ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2020
A natural language processing pipeline to advance the use of Twitter data for digital epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmenting fact and date of death in electronic health records using internet media sources: a validation study from two large healthcare systems.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- The economic imperative of artificial intelligence in maternal and neonatal health: a review of evaluation benefits, frameworks, challenges, future perspectives, and limitations.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Review
- Association Between COVID-19 During Pregnancy and Preterm Birth by Trimester of Infection: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Large-Scale Social Media Data.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Qualitative Health-Related Quality of Life and Natural Language Processing: Characteristics, Implications, and Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Early-stage pregnancy recognition on microblogs: Machine learning and lexicon-based approaches.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Demystifying the Role of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Smart City Applications: Background, Motivation, Recent Advances, and Future Research Directions.Wireless personal communications · 2023Review
- Using Twitter Data for Cohort Studies of Drug Safety in Pregnancy: Proof-of-concept With β-Blockers.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Toward Using Twitter for PrEP-Related Interventions: An Automated Natural Language Processing Pipeline for Identifying Gay or Bisexual Men in the United States.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Article
- Toward Using Twitter Data to Monitor COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnancy: Proof-of-Concept Study of Cohort Identification.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- ReportAGE: Automatically extracting the exact age of Twitter users based on self-reports in tweets.PloS one · 2022Article
- Toward Using Twitter for Tracking COVID-19: A Natural Language Processing Pipeline and Exploratory Data Set.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- An annotated data set for identifying women reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes on Twitter.Data in brief · 2020Article
- A chronological and geographical analysis of personal reports of COVID-19 on Twitter from the UK.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the United States, 17% of pregnancies end in fetal loss: miscarriage or stillbirth. Preterm birth affects 10% of live births in the United States and is the leading cause of neonatal death globally. Preterm births with low birthweight are the second leading cause of infant mortality in the United States. Despite their prevalence, the causes of miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm birth are largely unknown.
objectiveThe primary objectives of this study are to (1) assess whether women report miscarriage, stillbirth, and preterm birth, among others, on Twitter, and (2) develop natural language processing (NLP) methods to automatically identify users from which to select cases for large-scale observational studies.
methodsWe handcrafted regular expressions to retrieve tweets that mention an adverse pregnancy outcome, from a database containing more than 400 million publicly available tweets posted by more than 100,000 users who have announced their pregnancy on Twitter. Two annotators independently annotated 8109 (one random tweet per user) of the 22,912 retrieved tweets, distinguishing those reporting that the user has personally experienced the outcome ("outcome" tweets) from those that merely mention the outcome ("non-outcome" tweets). Inter-annotator agreement was κ = 0.90 (Cohen's kappa). We used the annotated tweets to train and evaluate feature-engineered and deep learning-based classifiers. We further annotated 7512 (of the 8109) tweets to develop a generalizable, rule-based module designed to filter out reported speech-that is, posts containing what was said by others-prior to automatic classification. We performed an extrinsic evaluation assessing whether the reported speech filter could improve the detection of women reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes on Twitter.
resultsThe tweets annotated as "outcome" include 1632 women reporting miscarriage, 119 stillbirth, 749 preterm birth or premature labor, 217 low birthweight, 558 NICU admission, and 458 fetal/infant loss in general. A deep neural network, BERT-based classifier achieved the highest overall F
conclusionThis study demonstrates that (1) women do report their adverse pregnancy outcomes on Twitter, (2) our NLP pipeline can automatically identify users from which to select cases for large-scale observational studies, and (3) our reported speech filter would reduce the cost of annotating health-related social media data and can significantly improve the overall performance of feature-based classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.