Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34416911›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2021

Access, use and disposal of antimicrobials among humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda: a qualitative study.

David Musoke, Carol Namata, Grace Biyinzika Lubega, Freddy Eric Kitutu, Lawrence Mugisha, Saba Amir, Claire Brandish, Joviah Gonza, Deborah Ikhile, Filimin Niyongabo and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A One Health Comparative Study of MDRAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

David MusokeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. dmusoke@musph.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3262-3918
Carol NamataDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Grace Biyinzika LubegaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Freddy Eric KitutuSustainable Pharmaceutical Systems (SPS) Unit, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Lawrence MugishaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Saba AmirSchool of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG25 0QF, UK.
Claire BrandishBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
Joviah GonzaDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Deborah IkhileInstitute of Health and Allied Professions, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Filimin NiyongaboDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Bee Yean NgBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
Jean O'DriscollBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
Kate Russell-HobbsBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Aylesbury, HP21 8AL, UK.
Jody WinterDepartment of Biosciences, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG11 8NS, UK.
Linda GibsonInstitute of Health and Allied Professions, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Department of Disease Control · THBuckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GHBD Biosciences (United States) · USKerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INRural Resources · USSustainable Energy Systems (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

UK Department of Health and Social Care B10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate use of antimicrobials in both humans and animals is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In addition, human behaviours such as poor disposal of antimicrobials in the environment can increase their exposure to microbes which can impact on humans and animals. However, evidence on access, use and disposal of antimicrobials for humans and animals at community level in Uganda is limited. This study therefore explored access, use and disposal of antimicrobials among humans and animals in Wakiso district, Uganda.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted that involved focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews (KIIs). Participants of the FGDs were community health workers (CHWs) and farmers involved in animal husbandry, while key informants included: officials from the Ministry of Health; Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries; human and animal health professionals; district health officials; and members of the national AMR surveillance committee. Twelve FGDs were held (8 for CHWs and 4 for farmers) while 15 KIIs were conducted. Thematic analysis in NVivo (version 12) was performed.

resultsFive main themes emerged from the study: access to antimicrobials in humans; access to antimicrobials in animals; use of antimicrobials in humans; use of antimicrobials in animals; and disposal of antimicrobials. Community members mainly accessed antimicrobials for humans from public health facilities such as government health centres, as well as private facilities, including drug shops and clinics. Antimicrobials for animals were obtained from veterinary practitioners and drug shops (both for humans and veterinary). Examples of inappropriate use of antimicrobials in both humans and animals was evident, such as sharing antibiotics among household members, and giving human-prescribed antimicrobials to food-producing animals as growth promoters. While some CHWs returned unused antimicrobials to public health facilities for proper disposal, community members mainly disposed of antimicrobials with general household waste including dumping in rubbish pits.

conclusionsThere is a need to increase awareness among the population on proper access, use and disposal of antimicrobials for both humans and animals. Development of a drug disposal system at community level would facilitate improved waste management of antimicrobials. Together, these measures would help prevent the rate of progression of AMR in communities.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimicrobial resistanceAntimicrobialsAntimicrobial stewardshipCommunityHumansOne HealthUgandaWaste management

Identifiers

PMID34416911
PMCPMC8379804
OpenAlexW3194818569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.