Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34416889›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2021

E- Learning experience of the medical profession's college students during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia.

Eidan M Al Zahrani, Yaser A Al Naam, Saad M AlRabeeah, Deemah N Aldossary, Lamiaa H Al-Jamea, Alexander Woodman, Mohammad Shawaheen, Osama Altiti, Jenifer V Quiambao, Zechariah J Arulanantham and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eidan M Al ZahraniCollege Deanship, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Yaser A Al NaamDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 33048, 31448, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Saad M AlRabeeahDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Deemah N AldossaryDepartment of Anesthesia Technology, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Lamiaa H Al-JameaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 33048, 31448, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Alexander WoodmanVice Deanship of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad ShawaheenVice Deanship of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Osama AltitiE-Learning & Distance Education Unit, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Jenifer V QuiambaoVice Deanship of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Zechariah J ArulananthamVice Deanship of Postgraduate Studies and Research, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Salah H ElsafiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 33048, 31448, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. salah@psmchs.edu.sa.
Prince Sultan Military College of Health SciencesPrince Sultan University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide, most of educational institutions have moved to online electronic learning methods because of the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 8, 2020, the Saudi Ministry of Education announced remote learning for public and private schools and universities as a preventive and precautionary measure to curb the spread of the coronavirus. The objective of this study was to explore the e-learning experience of the students of the colleges of health sciences with regard to the technical preparedness, academic achievements, e-learning advantages and limitations. A well-structured and validated questionnaire on a five-point Likert scale and open-ended questions about their e-learning experience was distributed to a heterogeneous purposive sample of the health sciences students in Saudi Arabian universities.

resultsOf the 1288 respondents, of various demographical features a relatively higher proportion of 58.2 % agreed that they had enough information about the online learning. However, the proportion who reported receiving adequate guidance, technical support, and having satisfactory hardware and internet access to online learning were 48.1 %, 42, and 35.4 %, respectively. Of all participants, 40.8 % agreed that they had gained a good understanding of their courses learning outcomes. Only 30.0 % agreed that the quality of the online teaching was similar to traditional classes and 56.1 % agreed that the online learning is unsuitable for the medical sciences studies. E-learning advantages mentioned were the flexible accessibility of the learning materials, time, effort, and money saving, acquiring and improving technical and self-learning skills, health safety, interaction without shyness, and better academic accomplishment. On the other hand, disadvantages and difficulties included inadequate tools to facilitate online learning, poor internet connection, lack of technological skills by the educators and students. In addition, there was inadequate or lack of practical classes, lack of a unified clear policy for the conduct of online classes and exams and grade distribution, limited online exam time.

conclusionsThe sudden shift to e-learning without prior preparedness has revealed some pitfalls that need to be adjusted. The initial findings were considered satisfactory for such a new experience for both learners and students. However, there is a great chance for improving and expanding the e-learning process.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Saudi ArabiaUniversities

Identifiers

PMID34416889
PMCPMC8378523
OpenAlexW3194578152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.