ArticleJournal of dental research2022
Caries Detection on Intraoral Images Using Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Journal of dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
97 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for binary dental caries diagnosis using intraoral images and dental radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Applications of AI-based deep learning models for detecting dental caries on intraoral images - a systematic review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Self-monitoring of Oral Health Using Smartphone Selfie Powered by Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Preventive Dentistry.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Pooled it
- Uses of Different Machine Learning Algorithms for Diagnosis of Dental Caries.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Pooled it
- From Clinic to Community: An Interpretable Artificial Intelligence Framework for Enamel Caries Detection to Support Public Health Dentistry.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of large language models in the classification of superior labial frenulum attachments.Odontology · 2026Article
- A novel AI system for preliminary triage support in single-tooth edentulous spaces using intraoral images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Enhancing deep learning-based dental caries detection through feature pyramid network-based image segmentation.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Artificial Intelligence Driven Monitoring System Notifications: Clear Aligner and Oral Hygiene Perspectives.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Model for Second-Molar Lesions Related to Impacted Third Molars.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Assessing diagnostic performance of multimodal LLMs and a custom convolutional neural network in tooth-level caries detection and localization.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A Dual-Branch Deep Learning Framework with Explainability for Dental Caries Classification Using Intra-Oral Photographs and Radiographs.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- From algorithms to empathy: can large language models effectively answer patients' questions in restorative dentistry?BMC oral health · 2026Article
- AI-assisted age estimation from occlusal tooth wear using biofluorescence imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automatic estimation of single-tooth width from standardized two-dimensional occlusal photographs using deep learning.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Dental Caries Diagnosis: A Modality-Stratified Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Faster R-CNN and Mask R-CNN.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging trends in the early diagnosis of dental caries: a scoping review of artificial intelligence, digital diagnostics, and teledentistry.Evidence-based dentistry · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence: Applications and Future Prospects in Dentistry.International dental journal · 2026Review
37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although visual examination (VE) is the preferred method for caries detection, the analysis of intraoral digital photographs in machine-readable form can be considered equivalent to VE. While photographic images are rarely used in clinical practice for diagnostic purposes, they are the fundamental requirement for automated image analysis when using artificial intelligence (AI) methods. Considering that AI has not been used for automatic caries detection on intraoral images so far, this diagnostic study aimed to develop a deep learning approach with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for caries detection and categorization (test method) and to compare the diagnostic performance with respect to expert standards. The study material consisted of 2,417 anonymized photographs from permanent teeth with 1,317 occlusal and 1,100 smooth surfaces. All the images were evaluated into the following categories: caries free, noncavitated caries lesion, or caries-related cavitation. Each expert diagnosis served as a reference standard for cyclic training and repeated evaluation of the AI methods. The CNN was trained using image augmentation and transfer learning. Before training, the entire image set was divided into a training and test set. Validation was conducted by selecting 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the available images from the training set. The statistical analysis included calculations of the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). The CNN was able to correctly detect caries in 92.5% of cases when all test images were considered (SE, 89.6; SP, 94.3; AUC, 0.964). If the threshold of caries-related cavitation was chosen, 93.3% of all tooth surfaces were correctly classified (SE, 95.7; SP, 81.5; AUC, 0.955). It can be concluded that it was possible to achieve more than 90% agreement in caries detection using the AI method with standardized, single-tooth photographs. Nevertheless, the current approach needs further improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.