ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2021
Visuomotor control in mice and primates.
Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye-head coordination during goal-directed orienting in mice.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Eye-head coordination during goal-directed orienting in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Probing the limited oculomotor range of common marmosetsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Highly selective visual receptive fields in mouse frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The evolution of human-type consciousness - a by-product of mammalian innovation mechanism - a preliminary hypothesis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Cerebellum in Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases: an emerging research frontier.MedComm · 2024Review
- A frontal transcallosal inhibition loop mediates interhemispheric balance in visuospatial processing.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Sleep, plasticity, and sensory neurodevelopment.Neuron · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We conduct a comparative evaluation of the visual systems from the retina to the muscles of the mouse and the macaque monkey noting the differences and similarities between these two species. The topics covered include (1) visual-field overlap, (2) visual spatial resolution, (3) V1 cortical point-image [i.e., V1 tissue dedicated to analyzing a unit receptive field], (4) object versus motion encoding, (5) oculomotor range, (6) eye, head, and body movement coordination, and (7) neocortical and cerebellar function. We also discuss blindsight in rodents and primates which provides insights on how the neocortex mediates conscious vision in these species. This review is timely because the field of visuomotor neurophysiology is expanding beyond the macaque monkey to include the mouse; there is therefore a need for a comparative analysis between these two species on how the brain generates visuomotor responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.