Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415919›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Predicting treatment outcomes following an exacerbation of airways disease.

Andreas Halner, Sally Beer, Richard Pullinger, Mona Bafadhel, Richard E K Russell

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas HalnerRespiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9992-7364
Sally BeerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard PullingerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Mona BafadhelRespiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Richard E K RussellRespiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3890-7201
University of Oxford · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOPD and asthma exacerbations result in many emergency department admissions. Not all treatments are successful, often leading to hospital readmissions.

aimsWe sought to develop predictive models for exacerbation treatment outcome in a cohort of exacerbating asthma and COPD patients presenting to the emergency department.

methodsTreatment failure was defined as the need for additional systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and/or antibiotics, hospital readmissison or death within 30 days of initial emergency department visit. We performed univariate analysis comparing characteristics of patients either given or not given SCS at exacerbation and of patients who succeeded versus failed treatment. Patient demographics, medications and exacerbation symptoms, physiology and biology were available. We developed multivariate random forest models to identify predictors of SCS prescription and for predicting treatment failure.

resultsData were available for 81 patients, 43 (53%) of whom failed treatment. 64 (79%) of patients were given SCS. A random forest model using presence of wheeze at exacerbation and blood eosinophil percentage predicted SCS prescription with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.69. An 11 variable random forest model (which included medication, previous exacerbations, symptoms and quality of life scores) could predict treatment failure with AUC 0.81. A random forest model using just the two best predictors of treatment failure, namely, visual analogue scale for breathlessness and sputum purulence, predicted treatment failure with AUC 0.68.

conclusionPrediction of exacerbation treatment outcome can be achieved via supervised machine learning combining different predictors at exacerbation. Validation of our predictive models in separate, larger patient cohorts is required.

Indexed as

AsthmaEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationModels, BiologicalPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveQuality of LifeAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSoftware ValidationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID34415919
PMCPMC8378754
OpenAlexW3194206902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.