Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415555›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2021

"Being proactive, not reactive": exploring perceptions of genetic testing among White, Latinx, and Pacific Islander Populations.

Daniel Chavez-Yenter, Jennie Vagher, Margaret F Clayton, Mary Rindler, Masha Shukovich, Kimberly A Kaphingst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Chavez-Yenter *Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. daniel.chavez-yenter@utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-4443
Jennie Vagher *Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Margaret F ClaytonDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-5210
Mary RindlerUtah State Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Masha ShukovichCenter for Documentary Expression and Art, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6889-4803
Kimberly A KaphingstDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-9080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing is becoming an integral part of healthcare, but evidence suggests that both race and ethnicity influence access to and utilization of genetic testing. Given this barrier, data are needed on the perceptions of genetic testing in racial and ethnic minority groups. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of three types of genetic testing (genetic testing for adult-onset conditions, prenatal screening, and newborn screening) in a sample of US participants who identified as White, Pacific Islander, and Latinx (10 dyads from each group for 60 participants total). Data were collected through semi-structured dyadic interviews and assessed using thematic analysis. The major themes were knowledge as empowering, knowledge as stressful, and predictive nature of prenatal testing and newborn screening. Some differences were seen in themes by race and ethnicity. A sense of collective and familial health appeared to be a more important theme for Pacific Islander and Latinx participants compared to White participants. Adult-onset genetic testing was viewed variously across all groups with some noting how it may increase anxiety, particularly if the disease screened for was unable to be prevented with action. All three groups reported on the positives of prenatal testing and newborn screening yet often were confused on the differences between them. This study presents novel perceptions of genetic testing in participants from diverse communities across three types of genetic testing. Genetic healthcare providers should incorporate participants' perceptions, values, and beliefs into their counseling delivery as a way to engage with diverse communities.

Indexed as

CancerGenetic counselingGenetic testingLatinxNewborn screeningPacific IslanderPrenatal screening

Identifiers

PMID34415555
PMCPMC8554939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.