Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415519›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

The Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Utilization of Bariatric Surgery.

Ezra S Brooks, Elizabeth A Bailey, Catherine L Mavroudis, Christopher J Wirtalla, Victoria M Gershuni, Noel N Williams, Rachel R Kelz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Disparities in Access and Quality of Obesity Care.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ezra S Brooks *Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, 5th floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Ezra.Brooks@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Elizabeth A Bailey *Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, 6B Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Catherine L MavroudisCenter for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Christopher J WirtallaCenter for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Victoria M GershuniMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Noel N WilliamsMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rachel R KelzCenter for Surgery and Health Economics, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded Medicaid (ME) and instituted Essential Health Benefits (EHB) that included bariatric surgery coverage on a state-by-state opt-in basis, increasing insurance coverage of bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing a difference-in-differences framework, changes in bariatric surgery rates, defined as utilization in the population of people with obesity, before and after the ACA were evaluated in four states. Bariatric surgery procedure data were taken from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State In-patient Database 2012-2015. Adjusted multivariable regressions were run in the Medicaid and commercially insured populations.

resultsWe identified 36,456 bariatric surgeries across the 286 Health Service Areas and time periods, with 31,732 covered by commercial insurers and 4724 covered by Medicaid. An unadjusted increase in utilization rates was seen in the Medicaid and Commercial populations in both ME- and EHB-covered states as well as non-expansion and EHB opt-out states over time. In the Medicaid population, after adjusting for confounders, there was a significant increase of 24.77 cases per 100,000 people with obesity (95% confidence interval: 12.41, 37.13) in the expansion states relative to the control and pre-period. The commercial population experienced a nonsignificant change in the rates of bariatric surgery, decreasing by 2.89 cases per 100,000 people with obesity (95% confidence interval: - 21.59, 15.81).

conclusionsThere was a significant increase in bariatric surgery rates among Medicaid beneficiaries associated with Medicaid expansion, but there was no change among the commercially insured.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryObesity, MorbidHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMedicaidPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActUnited StatesAffordable Care ActBariatric surgeryEssential health benefitsMedicaid expansion

Identifiers

PMID34415519
OpenAlexW3194444505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.