Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415503›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

Surgical workflow recognition with 3DCNN for Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Bokai Zhang, Amer Ghanem, Alexander Simes, Henry Choi, Andrew Yoo

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Surgical phase and instrument recognition: how to identify appropriate dataset splits.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgical workflow recognition with temporal convolution and transformer for action segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bokai ZhangC-SATS, Inc. Johnson & Johnson, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. bzhang29@its.jnj.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1906-2116
Amer GhanemC-SATS, Inc. Johnson & Johnson, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Alexander SimesC-SATS, Inc. Johnson & Johnson, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Henry ChoiC-SATS, Inc. Johnson & Johnson, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Andrew YooC-SATS, Inc. Johnson & Johnson, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1100, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical workflow recognition is a crucial and challenging problem when building a computer-assisted surgery system. Current techniques focus on utilizing a convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network (CNN-RNN) to solve the surgical workflow recognition problem. In this paper, we attempt to use a deep 3DCNN to solve this problem.

methodsIn order to tackle the surgical workflow recognition problem and the imbalanced data problem, we implement a 3DCNN workflow referred to as I3D-FL-PKF. We utilize focal loss (FL) to train a 3DCNN architecture known as Inflated 3D ConvNet (I3D) for surgical workflow recognition. We use prior knowledge filtering (PKF) to filter the recognition results.

resultsWe evaluate our proposed workflow on a large sleeve gastrectomy surgical video dataset. We show that focal loss can help to address the imbalanced data problem. We show that our PKF can be used to generate smoothed prediction results and improve the overall accuracy. We show that the proposed workflow achieves 84.16% frame-level accuracy and reaches a weighted Jaccard score of 0.7327 which outperforms traditional CNN-RNN design.

conclusionThe proposed workflow can obtain consistent and smooth predictions not only within the surgical phases but also for phase transitions. By utilizing focal loss and prior knowledge filtering, our implementation of deep 3DCNN has great potential to solve surgical workflow recognition problems for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerSurgery, Computer-AssistedGastrectomyHumansWorkflow3D ConvNetComputer-assisted surgeryFocal lossSurgical workflow recognition

Identifiers

PMID34415503
PMCPMC8589754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.