Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415450›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gambling studies2022

Positive Illusions: The Role of Cognitive Distortions Related to Gambling and Temporal Perspective in Chasing Behavior.

Giovanna Nigro, Olimpia Matarazzo, Maria Ciccarelli, Barbara Pizzini, Mariagiulia Sacco, Marina Cosenza

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gambling studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanna NigroDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy. giovanna.nigro@unicampania.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3518-2468
Olimpia MatarazzoDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0788-1002
Maria CiccarelliDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7285-1707
Barbara PizziniDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5234-4823
Mariagiulia SaccoDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-7287
Marina CosenzaDepartment of Psychology, Università degli studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Viale Ellittico 31, 81100, Caserta, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5813-017X
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chasing, or continuing to gamble to recoup previous losses, is a behavioral marker and a diagnostic criterion for gambling disorder. Even though chasing has been recognized to play a central role in gambling disorder, research on chasing is still relatively scarce. This study first empirically investigated the interplay between cognitive distortions related to gambling, temporal perspective, and chasing behavior in a sample of habitual gamblers. Two hundred and fifty-five adults took part in the study. Participants completed the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS), the 14-item Consideration of Future Consequences scale (CFC-14), and performed a computerized task assessing chasing behavior. Participants were randomly assigned to three experimental conditions (Control, Loss, and Win). Hierarchical logistic regression analysis showed that the decision to chase depended on scores on the CFC-14 Immediate scale and the GRCS dimensions Gambling Expectancies and Interpretative Bias. Hierarchical linear regression analysis indicated that, chasing frequency was affected by Loss condition, distortions related to gambling expectancies and predictive control, as well as by myopia for the future. Interestingly, the results of path analysis clearly indicated that some cognitions related to gambling predict chasing frequency not only directly, but also indirectly via shortened time horizon. Notably, gambling severity did not predict either the decision to chase, or the chasing persistence. These findings provide further evidence that nonchasers and chasers seem to belong to two quite distinct subtypes of gamblers. Such a difference could be useful for targeting more effective intervention strategies in gambling disorder treatment.

Indexed as

GamblingIllusionsAdultCognitionHumansRegression AnalysisChasing behaviorGamblingGambling disorderGambling-related cognitive distortionsTemporal perspective

Identifiers

PMID34415450
PMCPMC8377335
OpenAlexW3195034591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.