Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415418›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2021

Long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot: a systematic review.

Anuj Rastogi, Anil Agarwal

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Achilles Tendon Release in Clubfoot: Radiological Comparison of Needle and Scalpel Techniques.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anuj RastogiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Integral Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Integral University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anil AgarwalDepartment of Paediatric Orthopaedics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Geeta Colony, Delhi, 110031, India. rachna_anila@yahoo.co.in.
Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya · INInstitute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Ponseti method has revolutionized the clubfoot treatment and has been adopted globally in the past couple of decades. However, most reported results of the Ponseti method are either short or midterm. Studies reporting long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method are limited. The following systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the published articles on long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method. MATERIAL AND

methodsA literature search was performed for articles published in electronic database PubMed (includes Medline) and Cochrane for broad keywords: "Clubfoot"; "Ponseti method/technique"; "long term outcomes/results." Studies selected included full-text articles in English language on children less than one year with primary idiopathic clubfoot treated by the Ponseti method with mean ten year follow-up. Non-idiopathic causes or syndromic clubfoot and case reports/review articles/meta-analyses were excluded. The following parameters were included for analysis: number of patients/clubfeet, male/female, mean age at treatment, mean/range of follow-up, relapses, additional surgery, range of motion, various outcome scores, and radiological variables.

resultsFourteen studies with 774 patients/1122 feet were included. The male:female ratio was 2.4:1. Mean follow-up recorded in studies was 14.5 years. Relapses occurred in 47% patients with additional surgery being required in 79% patients with relapses. Of these, 86% of surgery were extra-articular while 14% were intra-articular. Plantigrade foot was achieved in majority patients with mean ankle dorsiflexion of 11 degrees. The outcome scores were in general good in contrast to radiological angles which were mostly outside normal range with talar flattening/navicular wedging/degenerative osteoarthritis changes occurring in 60%, 76%, and 30%, respectively.

conclusionsLong-term follow-up of infants with primary idiopathic clubfeet treated by the Ponseti method revealed relatively high relapse and additional surgery rates. Radiologically, the various angles were inconsistent compared to normal ranges and anatomical deformations/degenerative changes were present in treated feet. Moreover, the relapse rates and requirement of additional surgery increased on long-term follow-up. Despite this, majority feet were plantigrade and demonstrated good clinical results as measured by various outcome tools. There should be emphasis on long-term follow-up of children with clubfeet in view of late relapses and secondary late changes.

Indexed as

ClubfootCasts, SurgicalChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFootHumansInfantMaleManipulation, OrthopedicRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeClubfeetLong termOutcomePonseti methodRelapseSurgery

Identifiers

PMID34415418
OpenAlexW3194810289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.