Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415410›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Whole tumor volumetric ADC analysis: relationships with histopathological differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Ferhat Can Piskin, Huseyin Tugsan Balli, Kivilcim Eren Erdoğan, Sinan Sozutok, Kairgeldy Aikimbaev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ferhat Can PiskinDepartment of Radiology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey. ferhatcpiskin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-1077
Huseyin Tugsan BalliDepartment of Radiology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-0097
Kivilcim Eren ErdoğanDepartment of Pathology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4951-8703
Sinan SozutokDepartment of Radiology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-2312
Kairgeldy AikimbaevDepartment of Radiology, Balcali Hospital, Cukurova University Medical School, Adana, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5436-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between values obtained from whole tumor volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and histopathological grade in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

methodsFifty-one naïve patients with HCC were included in the study. The tumors were classified according to the Edmondson-Steiner grade and separated as well-differentiated and non-well-differentiated (moderately and poorly differentiated). The ADC parameters of groups were compared by applying Mann-Whitney U test. The correlation between tumors' histopathological stage and whole tumor ADC parameters was investigated using Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (ROC) was applied to calculate the area under curve (AUC) with intersection point of ADC parameters and curve.

resultsMean and percentile ADC values of well-differentiated tumors were significantly higher than those of non-well-differentiated tumors (p < 0.05). The strongest correlation between histopathological grade and ADC parameters was 75th percentile ADC (r = - 0.501), 50th percentile ADC (r = - 0.476) and mean ADC (r = - 0.465). Mean, 75th and 50th percentile ADC values used for the distinction of groups gave the highest AUC at ROC analysis (0.781, 0.781, 0.767, respectively). When threshold values of mean, 75th and 50th percentile ADC values were applied (1516 mm

conclusionsA correlation between whole tumor volumetric ADC values and HCCs' histopathological grade was detected in this study. 75th percentile, 50th percentile and mean ADC values are determined as highly sensitive and specific tests when the threshold values are applied for distinguishing between well-differentiated tumors and moderately/poorly differentiated tumors. When all these findings are evaluated together, HCCs' volumetric ADC values might be a useful noninvasive predictive parameters for histopathological grade in patients with HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansRetrospective StudiesDiffusion-weighted imagingHepatocellular carcinomaHistopathological differentiationVolumetric apparent diffusion coefficient

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.