Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415399›Full record

ReviewLung2021

Inhalational Constrictive Bronchiolitis: The Evolution of our Understanding of this Disease.

Daniel E Banks, Michael J Morris

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lung, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A breath of not so fresh air….Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel E BanksOrlando Veterans Administration Medical Center, Room 4H811, 13800 Veterans Way, Orlando, FL, 32827, USA. Dbanks49@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-4820
Michael J MorrisPulmonary and Critical Care Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Brooke Army Medical Center · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The case definition of inhalational constrictive bronchiolitis (CB) has changed over the generations. We identify changes in the description of this illness over time associated with different exposures and present the natural history of CB in a case attributed to military burn pit exposure. The initial descriptions of this disease began with nitric acid spills and silage exposures. In these events, there was an acute exposure, typically a short-term resolution of the adverse respiratory events, and then a progression, leading to disability or a respiratory death. The life-saving role of corticosteroid therapy in this situation was recognized. War gas exposures of World War I and then Saddam Hussein's use of sulfur mustard gas in the Iran-Iraq War followed. More recently the findings associated with diacetyl exposure in commercial popcorn workers remained consistent with previously described presentations, but then the clinical presentation in troops returning from deployment to Southwest Asia was very different, yet with the same histologic findings. We recognize unreconciled disparities in the clinical, physiologic, and imaging presentation in those with inhalational bronchiolitis and acknowledge this as perhaps one of the difficult diagnoses in respiratory medicine.

Indexed as

Bronchiolitis ObliteransMilitary PersonnelBiopsyHumansMiddle EastTomography, X-Ray ComputedAirways obstructionBronchiolitisInhalation exposure

Identifiers

PMID34415399
OpenAlexW3194006091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.