Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415271›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society2021

Detection of Optic Disc Abnormalities in Color Fundus Photographs Using Deep Learning.

T Y Alvin Liu, Jinchi Wei, Hongxi Zhu, Prem S Subramanian, David Myung, Paul H Yi, Ferdinand K Hui, Mathias Unberath, Daniel S W Ting, Neil R Miller

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Can Tele-Neuro-Ophthalmology Be Useful Beyond the Pandemic?Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T Y Alvin LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology (TYAL, NRM), Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Biomedical Engineering (JW), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare (HZ, MU), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiology (PHY, FKH), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Singapore Eye Research Institute (DSWT), Singapore National Eye Center, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore ; Department of Ophthalmology (PSS), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado; and Department of Ophthalmology (DM), Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Jinchi Wei
Hongxi Zhu
Prem S Subramanian
David Myung
Paul H Yi
Ferdinand K Hui
Mathias Unberath
Daniel S W Ting
Neil R Miller
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, deep learning-based detection of optic disc abnormalities in color fundus photographs has mostly been limited to the field of glaucoma. However, many life-threatening systemic and neurological conditions can manifest as optic disc abnormalities. In this study, we aimed to extend the application of deep learning (DL) in optic disc analyses to detect a spectrum of nonglaucomatous optic neuropathies.

methodsUsing transfer learning, we trained a ResNet-152 deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to distinguish between normal and abnormal optic discs in color fundus photographs (CFPs). Our training data set included 944 deidentified CFPs (abnormal 364; normal 580). Our testing data set included 151 deidentified CFPs (abnormal 71; normal 80). Both the training and testing data sets contained a wide range of optic disc abnormalities, including but not limited to ischemic optic neuropathy, atrophy, compressive optic neuropathy, hereditary optic neuropathy, hypoplasia, papilledema, and toxic optic neuropathy. The standard measures of performance (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC)) were used for evaluation.

resultsDuring the 10-fold cross-validation test, our DCNN for distinguishing between normal and abnormal optic discs achieved the following mean performance: AUC-ROC 0.99 (95 CI: 0.98-0.99), sensitivity 94% (95 CI: 91%-97%), and specificity 96% (95 CI: 93%-99%). When evaluated against the external testing data set, our model achieved the following mean performance: AUC-ROC 0.87, sensitivity 90%, and specificity 69%.

conclusionIn summary, we have developed a deep learning algorithm that is capable of detecting a spectrum of optic disc abnormalities in color fundus photographs, with a focus on neuro-ophthalmological etiologies. As the next step, we plan to validate our algorithm prospectively as a focused screening tool in the emergency department, which if successful could be beneficial because current practice pattern and training predict a shortage of neuro-ophthalmologists and ophthalmologists in general in the near future.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalHumansOptic DiskOptic Nerve DiseasesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID34415271
PMCPMC10637344
OpenAlexW3194991043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.