Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415198›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

The role of CT, PET-CT, and MRI in ovarian cancer.

Maurits Peter Engbersen, Willemien Van Driel, Doenja Lambregts, Max Lahaye

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Value of anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Radiomics and radiogenomics in ovarian cancer: a review with a focus on ultrasound applications.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maurits Peter EngbersenDepartment of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Willemien Van DrielDepartment of Gynecology, Center of Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Doenja LambregtsDepartment of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Max LahayeDepartment of Radiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New treatment developments in ovarian cancer have led to a renewed interest in staging advanced ovarian cancer. The treatment of females with ovarian cancer patients has a strong multidisciplinary character with an essential role for the radiologist. This review aims to provide an overview of the current position of CT, positron emission tomography-CT, and MRI in ovarian cancer and how imaging can be used to guide multidisciplinary team discussions.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOvarian NeoplasmsOvaryPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID34415198
PMCPMC9327775
OpenAlexW3193991038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.