Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415197›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Application of conventional ultrasonography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the axillary lymph nodes and evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Xue Han, Shiyang Jin, Huajing Yang, Jinxing Zhang, Zhenfeng Huang, Jiguang Han, Chuan He, Hongyan Guo, Yue Yang, Ming Shan and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xue HanDepartment of Ultrasound, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Shiyang JinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Huajing YangDepartment of Ultrasound, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Jinxing ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Zhenfeng HuangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Jiguang HanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Chuan HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Hongyan GuoDepartment of Biochemistry, Qiqihar Medical University, No. 333 Bukui North Road, Qiqihar, China.
Yue YangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Ming ShanDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.
Guoqiang ZhangDepartment of Breast Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No. 150 Haping Road, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-7533
Harbin Medical University · CNQiqihar Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAxillary lymph node status assessment has always been an important issue in clinical treatment of breast cancer. However, there has been no effective method to accurately predict the pathological complete response (pCR) of axillary lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The objective of our study was to investigate whether conventional ultrasonography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) can be used to evaluate axillary lymph node status of breast cancer patients after NAC.

methodsA total of 74 patients who underwent NAC were recruited for the present study. Prior to and after NAC, examinations of conventional ultrasonography and CEUS were performed. After evaluating the images of conventional ultrasonography, four characteristics were recorded: lymph node medulla boundary, cortex of lymph node, lymph node hilus, and lymph node aspect ratio. Two additional imaging characteristics of CEUS were analyzed: CEUS way and CEUS pattern. Receiver operating characteristiccurve analysis was applied to evaluate their diagnostic performance.

resultsAfter 6~8 cycles of NAC, 46 (71.9%) patients had negative axillary lymph node, and 18 (28.1%) patients turned out non-pCR. According to statistical analysis, lymph node medulla, lymph node aspect ratio and CEUS way were independently associated with pCR of axillary lymph node after NAC. The area under the curve of the prediction model with three imaging characteristics was 0.882 (95% confidence interval: 0.608-0.958), and the accuracy to predict the patients' lymph node status was 78.1% (

conclusionsConventional ultrasonography combined with CEUS technology can accurately predict axillary lymph nodes status of breast cancer patients after NAC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The usefulness of CEUS technology in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is highlighted.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAxillaBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansImage EnhancementLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID34415197
PMCPMC9327747
OpenAlexW3193697205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.