ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2022
Adding Weekly Intramuscular Progesterone to a Twice Daily Vaginal Progesterone Capsule for Luteal Phase Support in IVF/ICSI Cycles Results in Similar Live Birth Rates.
Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Luteal phase support in fresh and frozen embryo transfers.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2022Review
- Systematic use of long-acting intramuscular progesterone in addition to oral dydrogesterone as luteal phase support for single fresh blastocyst transfer: A pilot study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Combined Progesterone Administration Versus Single-Route Administration for Luteal Phase Support in IVF: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Journal of reproduction & infertilityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing artificial reproductive treatment (ART) and fresh embryo transfer (ET) who received twice-daily vaginal progesterone capsule (Cyclogest) alone verses twice daily vaginal progesterone capsule (Cyclogest) plus weekly intramuscular Hydroxyprogesterone Capronate (Proluton depot) for luteal phase support.
methodsA retrospective cohort study that included 1162 patients who completed fresh ART/ET cycle from January 2015 to April 2018. Vaginal Cyclogest 400 mg twice daily was given to 985 patients following oocytes retrieval; whereas 177 patients received weekly intramuscular Proluton depot 250 mg in addition to twice-daily Cyclogest. The primary outcome was live birth rate. The secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy, biochemical, and early and late pregnancy loss.
resultsThere was no difference between the twice-daily vaginal progesterone and the addition of weekly intramuscular progesterone injections to the twice-daily vaginal progesterone regarding a positive pregnancy test (40.5% and 46.9%, respectively, p=0.112). There was no statistical difference in live birth rates between the groups (24% for group one, 26% for group two, p=0.582).
conclusionsThe administration of weekly intramuscular progesterone in addition to twice-daily vaginal progesterone capsule for luteal phase support post ART cycle does not result in higher live birth rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.