Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415107›Full record

ReviewChemMedChem2021

Mutual Prodrugs of 5-Fluorouracil: From a Classic Chemotherapeutic Agent to Novel Potential Anticancer Drugs.

Valeria Ciaffaglione, Maria N Modica, Valeria Pittalà, Giuseppe Romeo, Loredana Salerno, Sebastiano Intagliata

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ChemMedChem, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valeria CiaffaglioneDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
Maria N ModicaDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
Valeria PittalàDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe RomeoDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
Loredana SalernoDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.
Sebastiano IntagliataDepartment of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125, Catania, Italy.

Funding

PON R&I funds AIM1872330PON R&I funds E66C18001320007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of potent antitumor agents with a low toxicological profile against healthy cells is still one of the greatest challenges facing medicinal chemistry. In this context, the "mutual prodrug" approach has emerged as a potential tool to overcome undesirable physicochemical features and mitigate the side effects of approved drugs. Among broad-spectrum chemotherapeutics available for clinical use today, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is one of the most representative, also included in the World Health Organization model list of essential medicines. Unfortunately, severe side effects and drug resistance phenomena are still the primary limits and drawbacks in its clinical use. This review describes the progress made over the last ten years in developing 5-FU-based mutual prodrugs to improve the therapeutic profile and achieve targeted delivery to cancer tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticCell Line, TumorDrug SynergismEnzyme InhibitorsFluorouracilHumansNeoplasmsProdrugsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticEnzyme InhibitorsFluorouracilProdrugs5-Fluorouracil5-FU conjugates5-FU hybridsAnticancer agentsMutual prodrugs

Identifiers

PMID34415107
PMCPMC9290623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.