ArticleMedical physics2021
Deep learning enabled ultra-fast-pitch acquisition in clinical X-ray computed tomography.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-based motion simulation framework for deep learning-assisted motion correction in dynamic wrist CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Physics-informed model-based generative neural network for synthesizing scanner- and algorithm-specific low-dose CT exams.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Simulating scanner-and algorithm-specific 3D CT noise texture using physics-informed 2D and 2.5D generative neural network models.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- Origins of and lessons from quantitative functional X-ray computed tomography of the lung.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Improving coronary artery imaging in single source CT with cardiac motion correction using attention and spatial transformer based neural networks.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
- Automated Method for Evaluation of Z-axis Laser Alignment Accuracy using the Siemens Computed Tomography Phantom.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn X-raycomputed tomography (CT), many important clinical applications may benefit from a fast acquisition speed. The helical scan is the most widely used acquisition mode in clinical CT, where a fast helical pitch can improve the acquisition speed. However, on a typical single-source helical CT (SSCT) system, the helical pitch p typically cannot exceed 1.5; otherwise, reconstruction artifacts will result from data insufficiency. The purpose of this work is to develop a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to correct for artifacts caused by an ultra-fast pitch, which can enable faster acquisition speed than what is currently achievable.
methodsA customized CNN (denoted as ultra-fast-pitch network (UFP-net)) was developed to restore the underlying anatomical structure from the artifact-corrupted post-reconstruction data acquired from SSCT with ultra-fast pitch (i.e., p ≥ 2). UFP-net employed residual learning to capture the features of image artifacts. UFP-net further deployed in-house-customized functional blocks with spatial-domain local operators and frequency-domain non-local operators, to explore multi-scale feature representation. Images of contrast-enhanced patient exams (n = 83) with routine pitch setting (i.e., p < 1) were retrospectively collected, which were used as training and testing datasets. This patient cohort involved CT exams over different scan ranges of anatomy (chest, abdomen, and pelvis) and CT systems (Siemens Definition, Definition Flash, Definition AS+, Siemens Healthcare, Inc.), and the corresponding base CT scanning protocols used consistent settings of major scan parameters (e.g., collimation and pitch). Forward projection of the original images was calculated to synthesize helical CT scans with one regular pitch setting (p = 1) and two ultra-fast-pitch setting (p = 2 and 3). All patient images were reconstructed using the standard filtered-back-projection (FBP) algorithm. A customized multi-stage training scheme was developed to incrementally optimize the parameters of UFP-net, using ultra-fast-pitch images as network inputs and regular pitch images as labels. Visual inspection was conducted to evaluate image quality. Structural similarity index (SSIM) and relative root-mean-square error (rRMSE) were used as quantitative quality metrics.
resultsThe UFP-net dramatically improved image quality over standard FBP at both ultra-fast-pitch settings. At p = 2, UFP-net yielded higher mean SSIM (> 0.98) with lower mean rRMSE (< 2.9%), compared to FBP (mean SSIM < 0.93; mean rRMSE > 9.1%). Quantitative metrics at p = 3: UFP-net-mean SSIM [0.86, 0.94] and mean rRMSE [5.0%, 8.2%]; FBP-mean SSIM [0.36, 0.61] and mean rRMSE [36.0%, 58.6%].
conclusionThe proposed UFP-net has the potential to enable ultra-fast data acquisition in clinical CT without sacrificing image quality. This method has demonstrated reasonable generalizability over different body parts when the corresponding CT exams involved consistent base scan parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.