Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34415011›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2022

BestFIT Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial Results: A SMART Approach to Developing Individualized Weight Loss Treatment Sequences.

Nancy E Sherwood, A Lauren Crain, Elisabeth M Seburg, Meghan L Butryn, Evan M Forman, Melissa M Crane, Rona L Levy, Alicia S Kunin-Batson, Robert W Jeffery

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02368002 (Evaluating Options for Non-Responders), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02368002 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluating Options for Non-Responders: A SMART Approach to Enhancing Weight Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorHealthPartners InstituteRan2015 to 2019Enrolled468ConditionsObesityArmsBehavioral weight loss therapy, Portion-controlled meals, Acceptance-based treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy E SherwoodDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3365-9018
A Lauren CrainHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
Elisabeth M SeburgHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.
Meghan L ButrynDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Evan M FormanDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7233-1384
Melissa M CraneDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rona L LevySchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alicia S Kunin-BatsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Robert W JefferyDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota · USDrexel University · USHealthPartners · USRush University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Obesity and Energy Metabolism CoreP30DK050456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BERNLOHR, DAVID A · 1995 to 2015
$17.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research - Translational Intervention Methodology CoreP30DK111022 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI JEFFREY GONZALEZ · 2016 to 2026
$7.8M
Minnesota Obesity Prevention Training (MnOPT)T32DK083250 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KOTZ, CATHERINE M, LASKA, MELISSA N. · 2010 to 2024
$5.1M
Evaluating Options for Non-Responders: A SMART Approach to Enhancing Weight LossR01CA188892 · NCI · HEALTHPARTNERS INSTITUTE · PI CRAIN, A LAUREN, SHERWOOD, NANCY E. · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188892NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK083250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundState-of-the-art behavioral weight loss treatment (SBT) can lead to clinically meaningful weight loss, but only 30-60% achieve this goal. Developing adaptive interventions that change based on individual progress could increase the number of people who benefit. PURPOSE: Conduct a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) to determine the optimal time to identify SBT suboptimal responders and whether it is better to switch to portion-controlled meals (PCM) or acceptance-based treatment (ABT).

methodThe BestFIT trial enrolled 468 adults with obesity who started SBT and were randomized to treatment response assessment at Session 3 (Early TRA) or 7 (Late TRA). Suboptimal responders were re-randomized to PCM or ABT. Responders continued SBT. Primary outcomes were weight change at 6 and 18 months.

resultsPCM participants lost more weight at 6 months (-18.4 lbs, 95% CI -20.5, -16.2) than ABT participants (-15.7 lbs, 95% CI: -18.0, -13.4), but this difference was not statistically significant (-2.7 lbs, 95% CI: -5.8, 0.5, p = .09). PCM and ABT participant 18 month weight loss did not differ. Early and Late TRA participants had similar weight losses (p = .96), however, Early TRA PCM participants lost more weight than Late TRA PCM participants (p = .03).

conclusionsResults suggest adaptive intervention sequences that warrant further research (e.g., identify suboptimal responders at Session 3, use PCMs as second-stage treatment). Utilizing the SMART methodology to develop an adaptive weight loss intervention that would outperform gold standard SBT in a randomized controlled trial is an important next step, but may require additional optimization work. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier; NCT02368002.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight LossAdultBehavior TherapyHumansMotivationTreatment OutcomeAdultsInterventionObesityWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID34415011
PMCPMC8887581
OpenAlexW3196166709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.