Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414998›Full record

SynthesisMedicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal2021

Frailty and risk of complications in head and neck oncologic surgery. Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

M-L Mendes, C Mahl, A-C Carvalho, V-S Santos, D-M Tanajura, P-R Martins-Filho

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The use of frailty screening measures for predicting long-term survival outcomes in head and neck cancer: a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-dimensional frailty and Oral Health-Related Quality-of-Life in older adults: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M-L MendesUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Hospital Universitário Laboratório de Patologia Investigativa Rua Cláudio Batista, s/n. Bairro Sanatório CEP: 49060-100. Aracaju, Sergipe, Brasil saqmartins@hotmail.com.
C Mahl
A-C Carvalho
V-S Santos
D-M Tanajura
P-R Martins-Filho
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRCentro Universitário Cesmac · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is emerging evidence that frail individuals present a decreased physiological reserve, decreased ability to maintain homeostasis, and increased vulnerability to stressors. The concept of frailty has become increasingly recognized as a valuable measure in oncological surgical patients, including those with head and neck cancer. Preoperative screening for frailty may provide an individualized risk assessment that can be used by an interdisciplinary team for preoperative counseling and to improve outcomes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between frailty and the risk of major postoperative complications in frail individuals submitted to head and neck oncologic surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsPubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Google Scholar and OpenThesis were systematically searched to identify studies that evaluated the risk of major postoperative complications in frail individuals undergoing head and neck oncologic surgery. The search was performed on August 31, 2020, without language or date restrictions. Two independent investigators screened the searched studies based on each paper's title and abstract. Relevant studies were read in full and selected according to the eligibility criteria. Frailty was assessed by modified Frailty Index (mFI-11) and major postoperative complications were measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification. We performed a categorical and dose-response meta-analysis using a random-effects model to evaluate the association between frailty and the risk of major postoperative complications in patients submitted to head and neck oncologic surgery. The results of the meta-analysis were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

resultsFour studies (9,947 patients) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Frail patients presented an increased risk of life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission (RR = 4.67; 95% CI 1.54-14.10) and 30-day mortality (RR = 8.10; 95% CI 2.30-28.57) compared to non-frail patients. We found evidence of dose-response trend between mFI-11 and major postoperative complications.

conclusionsHigher frailty scores are associated with a significant increase in ICU-level complications and 30-day mortality after head and neck oncologic surgery.

Indexed as

FrailtyHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsFrailty; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Mortality.

Identifiers

PMID34414998
PMCPMC8412444
OpenAlexW3193781128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.