Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414684›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

ITGB4 as a novel serum diagnosis biomarker and potential therapeutic target for colorectal cancer.

Xia Jiang, Jia Wang, Mengyu Wang, Mingda Xuan, Shuangshuang Han, Chao Li, Meng Li, Xiao-Feng Sun, Weifang Yu, Zengren Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xia JiangHebei Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-4572-0039
Jia WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Mengyu WangDepartment of Endoscopy Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Mingda XuanDepartment of Endoscopy Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Shuangshuang HanDepartment of Endoscopy Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Chao LiDepartment of Endoscopy Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Meng LiHebei Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Xiao-Feng SunDepartment of Oncology and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Weifang YuHebei Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Zengren ZhaoHebei Key Laboratory of Colorectal Cancer Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, P.R. China.
Hebei Medical University · CNLinköping University · SE

Funding

National international science and technology cooperation project 2014DFA31150S&T Program of Hebei 18277741D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop new and effective biomarkers for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). EXPERIMENTAL

designThe serum expression of ITGB4 (49 CRC and 367 HC) was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and its diagnostic value was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The sensitivity and specificity of ITGB4 in CRC diagnosis were calculated through statistical analysis. The optimal clinical cutoff value was calculated using the Youden index, and diagnostic efficacy was analyzed in a larger serum sample (98 CRC and 1631 non-CRC). The expression of ITGB4 was measured by CyTOF (cell experimental technology) at the single-cell level, and characteristics were analyzed using viSNE and SPADE TREE.

resultsSerum ITGB4 and CEA levels were significantly higher in CRC patients than in HC and non-CRC patients. The use of serum ITGB4 levels for the diagnosis of CRC has a high sensitivity (79%) but not high specificity when the clinical cutoff value was 0.70 ng/mL. However, the optimal cutoff value was 1.6 ng/mL with 86.2% specificity and 52.0% sensitivity, and the diagnostic efficacy was greatly improved with high specificity (82.0%) and sensitivity (71.4%) when combined with CEA. ITGB4 expression characteristics were measured and related to the expression of EpCAM, Ck8/18, and perforin at the single-cell level. Single-cell analysis showed that cell clusters with low expression of CK8/18 and ITGB4 were more sensitive to 5FU and radiotherapy (RT).

conclusionsITGB4 is an effective diagnostic serum biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for CRC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIntegrin beta4MaleRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTransfectionBiomarkers, TumorIntegrin beta4ITGB4 protein, humancolorectal cancerCyTOFdiagnosis biomarkerITGB4Single-cell level

Identifiers

PMID34414684
PMCPMC8495272
OpenAlexW3194383370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.