Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414681›Full record

ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2022

Supporting doctors' well-being and resilience during COVID-19: A framework for rapid and rigorous intervention development.

Kathrine Gibson Smith, Kathryn B Cunningham, Joanne E Cecil, Anita Laidlaw, Patrick Cairns, Gillian M Scanlan, Tricia R Tooman, Gill Aitken, Julie Ferguson, Lisi Gordon and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kathrine Gibson SmithCentre for Healthcare Research Education and Innovation (CHERI), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-4701
Kathryn B CunninghamSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3300-7220
Joanne E CecilSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Anita LaidlawSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Patrick CairnsSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Gillian M ScanlanCentre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Tricia R ToomanSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Gill AitkenCentre for Medical Education, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julie FergusonNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Lisi GordonCentre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Peter W JohnstonCentre for Healthcare Research Education and Innovation (CHERI), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Lindsey PopeSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Judy WakelingNHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Kim A WalkerCentre for Healthcare Research Education and Innovation (CHERI), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office COV/ABN/20/06Chief Scientist Office COV/DUN/20/01Chief Scientist Office COV/DUN/20/04Chief Scientist Office Rapid Research in Covid -19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper aims to outline the development of a theoretically informed and evidence-based intervention strategy to underpin interventions to support the well-being of doctors during COVID-19 and beyond; delineate new ways of working were employed to ensure a rapid and rigorous process of intervention development and present the resulting novel framework for intervention development. The research comprised four workstreams: literature review (WS1), qualitative study (WS2), intervention development and implementation (WS3) and evaluation (WS4). Due to time constraints, we employed a parallel design for WS1-3 with the findings of WS1-2 informing WS3 on a continual basis. WS3 was underpinned by the Behaviour Change Wheel. We recruited expert panels to assist with intervention development. We reflected on decisions taken to facilitate the rapid yet rigorous process of intervention development. The empirical output was a theoretically informed and evidence-based intervention strategy to underpin interventions to support doctors' well-being during COVID-19 and beyond. The methodological output was a novel framework that facilitates rapid and rigorous development of interventions. The intervention strategy provides a foundation for development and evaluation of tailored interventions to support doctors' well-being. The novel framework provides guidance for the development of interventions where the situation demands a rapid yet rigorous development process.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansHumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2behaviour changeinterventionmedicinemethodologyresiliencewell-being

Identifiers

PMID34414681
PMCPMC8444870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.