Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414631›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2021

Life satisfaction: The role of domain-specific reference points.

Sebastian Neumann-Böhme, Arthur E Attema, Werner B F Brouwer, Job N J A van Exel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sebastian Neumann-BöhmeErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8336-3736
Arthur E AttemaErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3607-6579
Werner B F BrouwerErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-8397
Job N J A van ExelErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4178-1777

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the evaluation of well-being, it is not only important what people have in absolute terms, but also how this compares to reference points in relative terms. We explore the relevance of relative comparisons by testing the effect of people's self-rated position on potential reference points for income and health on their subjective well-being. We used Multiple Discrepancies Theory as a framework to identify seven potentially relevant reference points for income and health. A representative sample (N = 550) of the Netherlands assessed their income and health relative to these reference points. In addition, we elicited monthly household income, health status (EQ-5D-5L), and subjective well-being (SWLS). In line with the literature, we found a negative convex relationship between subjective well-being and age and a positive relationship with being employed, income, and health. For income, subjective well-being was also associated with how current income compared to respondents' needs and progression over time, and for health especially with how current health compared to what they felt they deserved. Our findings suggest that income and health are important for subjective well-being both in absolute and relative terms. We found negative effects on life satisfaction if some of the domain specific reference points were not met.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeEmotionsHumansIncomeNetherlandsSurveys and Questionnaireshealthincomemultiple discrepancy theoryreference pointssubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID34414631
PMCPMC9291216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.