Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414518›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2022

Antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) in palliative care: antibiotics, to give or not to give.

Kai Chee Hung, Lai Wei Lee, Yi Xin Liew, Lalit Krishna, Maciej Piotr Chlebicki, Shimin Jasmine Chung, Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kai Chee Hung *Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Lai Wei Lee *Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Yi Xin LiewDepartment of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Lalit KrishnaDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
Maciej Piotr ChlebickiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Shimin Jasmine ChungDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Andrea Lay-Hoon KwaDepartment of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore. andrea.kwa.l.h@sgh.com.sg.
Singapore General Hospital · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

National Medical Research Council, Singapore NMRC/CG/C005/2017National Medical Research Council, Singapore NMRC/CG/M011/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial therapy in terminally ill patients remains controversial as goals of care tend to be focused on optimizing comfort. International guidelines recommend for antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) involvement in antibiotic decisions in palliative patients. The primary objective was to evaluate the clinical impact of ASP interventions made to stop broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics in terminally ill patients. This was a retrospective chart review of 459 terminally ill patients in Singapore General Hospital audited by ASP between December 2010 and December 2018. Antibiotic duration, time-to-terminal discharge for end-of-life care, time-to-mortality, and mortality rates of patients with antibiotics ceased or continued upon ASP recommendations were compared. A total of 283 and 176 antibiotic courses were ceased and continued post-intervention, respectively. The intervention acceptance rate was 61.7%. The 7-day mortality rate (47.3% vs 61.9%, p = 0.003) was lower in the ceased group, while 30-day mortality rate (76.0% vs 81.2%, p = 0.203) and time-to-mortality post-intervention (3 [0-24] vs 2 [0-27] days, p = 0.066) did not differ between the ceased and continued groups. After excluding the 57 patients who had antibiotics continued until death within 48 h of intervention, only time-to-mortality post-intervention was statistically significantly shorter in the ceased group (3 [0-24] vs 4 [0-27], p < 0.001). Of the 131 terminally discharged patients, antibiotic duration (4 [0-17] vs 6.5 [1-14] days, p = 0.001) and time-to-terminal discharge post-intervention (6 [0-74] vs 10.5 [3-63] days, p = 0.001) were shorter in the ceased group. Antibiotic cessation in terminally ill patients was safe, and was associated with a significantly shorter time-to-terminal discharge.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipBacterial InfectionsFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesSingaporeTerminally IllAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic stewardshipPalliative careRetrospective study

Identifiers

PMID34414518
OpenAlexW3195161229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.