Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414432›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of clinical oncology2021

Current status of medical oncology in Japan and changes over the most recent 7-year period: results of a questionnaire sent to designated cancer care hospitals.

Makoto Arai, Izumi Ohno, Koji Takahashi, Meng Meng Fan, Akinobu Tawada, Chikashi Ishioka, Yuichi Takiguchi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Research Survey on Recognition of Medical Oncology among Medical Students and Junior Residents in Japan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto AraiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Izumi OhnoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Koji TakahashiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Meng Meng FanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Akinobu TawadaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Chikashi IshiokaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yuichi TakiguchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Chiba University · JPTohoku University · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to a questionnaire sent to Designated Cancer Care Hospitals in Japan in 2013, only 39.4% of the institutes had medical oncology departments. Furthermore, most of these medical oncology departments were primarily responsible for the treatment of limited disease categories and the administration of newly developed therapeutic modalities, including molecular-targeted therapy. The aim of the present study was to update these previous findings and to clarify the changes over the intervening 7-year period.

methodsThe questionnaire was sent to all 393 Designated Cancer Care Hospitals on 13 March 2020. Similar to the previous questionnaires, questions were asked regarding the presence of a medical oncology department, the number of physicians in the department and the degrees of responsibility for drug therapies provided by medical oncologists to adult patients with solid cancers.

resultsIn total, 270 institutions (68.7%) responded. Overall, 145 of these 270 institutions (53.7%) had medical oncology departments, representing a significant increase compared with the results of the previous study (P < 0.01). Among the institutions with a medical oncology department, these departments were responsible for the administration of over 30% of all cytotoxic and molecular-targeted drug therapies for extragonadal germ cell tumors, cancers of unknown primary site, soft tissues, head and neck, esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, and pancreas as well as the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for microsatellite instability-high tumors, cancers of the stomach, esophagus and head and neck, and melanoma.

conclusionThe proportion of institutes with medical oncology departments in Japan has increased. In addition, the responsibility of medical oncology departments has expanded to include newly emerging drugs, such as ICIs.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyMelanomaCancer Care FacilitiesHumansJapanSurveys and Questionnaireschemotherapyimmune-checkpoint inhibitorsmedical oncologymolecular-targeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID34414432
PMCPMC8558914
OpenAlexW3195017372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.