Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34414430›Full record

Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Rate control drugs differ in the prevention of progression of atrial fibrillation.

Tim Koldenhof, Petra E P J Wijtvliet, Nikki A H A Pluymaekers, Michiel Rienstra, Richard J Folkeringa, Patrick Bronzwaer, Arif Elvan, Jan Elders, Raymond Tukkie, Justin G L M Luermans and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Perioperative atrial fibrillation after non-cardiac surgery - A narrative review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Frequently Underappreciated Considerations in Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Atrial Fibrillation in Elite Athletes: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  11. Definition and management of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy: findings from the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Time of onset of atrial fibrillation and atrial fibrillation progression data from the RACE V study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  17. Ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation and the risk of heart failure and death.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Beta-blockers in atrial fibrillation-trying to make sense of unsettling results.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  19. A Year in Review: Atrial Fibrillation 2022.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Tim KoldenhofDepartment of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0321-3410
Petra E P J WijtvlietDepartment of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6841-1012
Nikki A H A PluymaekersDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9663-6315
Michiel RienstraDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2581-070X
Richard J FolkeringaDepartment of Cardiology, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Patrick BronzwaerDepartment of Cardiology, Zaans Medical Centre, Kon. Julianaplein 58, 1502 DV Zaandam, The Netherlands.
Arif ElvanDepartment of Cardiology, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8436-8635
Jan EldersDepartment of Cardiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Raymond TukkieDepartment of Cardiology, Spaarne Hospital, Boerhaavelaan 22, 2035 RC Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Justin G L M LuermansDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2796-729X
Sander M J van KuijkDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jan G P TijssenAmsterdam University Medical Centre (AMC), Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Isabelle C van GelderDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7579-1201
Harry J G M CrijnsDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robert G TielemanDepartment of Cardiology, Martini Hospital, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLIsala · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLZaans Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe hypothesize that in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), verapamil is associated with lower AF progression compared to beta blockers or no rate control. METHODS AND

resultsIn this pre-specified post hoc analysis of the RACE 4 randomized trial, the effect of rate control medication on AF progression in paroxysmal AF was analysed. Patients using Vaughan-Williams Class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of first electrical cardioversion (ECV), chemical cardioversion (CCV), or atrial ablation. Event rates are displayed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses are used to adjust for baseline differences. Out of 666 patients with paroxysmal AF, 47 used verapamil, 383 used beta blockers, and 236 did not use rate control drugs. The verapamil group was significantly younger than the beta blocker group and contained more men than the no rate control group. Over a mean follow-up of 37 months, the primary outcome occurred in 17% in the verapamil group, 33% in the beta blocker group, and 33% in the no rate control group (P = 0.038). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients using verapamil have a significantly lower chance of receiving ECV, CCV, or atrial ablation compared to patients using beta blockers [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.83] and no rate control (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.93).

conclusionIn patients with newly diagnosed paroxysmal AF, verapamil was associated with less AF progression, as compared to beta blockers and no rate control.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsElectric CountershockHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial fibrillationAtrial fibrillation progressionRACE 4 studyRate controlRhythm control

Identifiers

PMID34414430
PMCPMC8892061
OpenAlexW3194403625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.